From: Rik van Riel (riel_at_conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue 23 Oct 2001 - 20:32:11 BST
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Jacques Gelinas wrote:
> + sched
> This changes the way priority is calculated for processes in a
> vserver. The priority is kind of aglomerated. A vserver running 50
> active processes will have a same impact on the server as if it was
> running a single process (roughly).
Arghhhhh, this changes the scheduler's _fast path_, not fun.
Should I port my fairsched patch to a newer 2.4 kernel and
add vserver support for it ? My approach only changes the
priority recalculation in the scheduler and achieves pretty
much the same effect _without_ needing to change goodness().
-- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ (volunteers needed)