About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Jacques Gelinas (jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca)
Date: Sat 10 Aug 2002 - 03:44:40 BST


On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:06:53 -0500, Jukka Laaksola wrote
> Jacques Gelinas wrote:

> > We will need to change the way we handle that. Instead of having
> > IPROOT and IPROOTDEV, we will have something like
> >
> > IPROOT="eth0/IP1 eth1/IP2 IP3 IP4"
> > IPROOTDEV=eth2
> >
> > Any IP no explicitly tied to a device will be configured with IPROOTDEV. In
> > the example above, IP3 and IP4 will go on eth2.
> >
> > What do you think ?
>
> Sounds good to me. It's quite clear way to configure IPs and devices.
> Perhaps the feature is in the next version of vserser?

Finally I implented it using : instead of /

IPROOT="eth0:1.2.3.4 eth1:2.3.4.5"

One day will implement the / to support per IP netmask...

Will be in 0.19. Almost done with the rest...

---------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Gelinas <jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Wed 06 Nov 2002 - 07:03:42 GMT by hypermail 2.1.3