From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Wed 30 Oct 2002 - 13:02:37 GMT
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:52:23PM -0500, Jacques Gelinas wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:41:20 -0500, Dave wrote
> > For example I don't mind if the context has to be fixed for each
> > vserver, if this was the price for not having to patch userland tools.
> > If we combine the 16bit uid + 16bit context, there're still 64K servers
> > to be created before we run out of "virtuals" on the same machine.
> > Right?
> Btw, for those who want to play with special context (assigned by hand),
> I can change the kernel so on-the-fly security context are allocated
> from 1000 and up making sure the one you have select by hand will only
> be used by this vserver.
that is a good idea, except that I would prefer to change
the bias of the dynamic contexts (at compile or even better