From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Sat 02 Nov 2002 - 00:18:05 GMT
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:26:57PM +0100, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 16:57, Paul Sladen wrote:
> > On 31 Oct 2002, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> > > that obviously goes wrong, as I have not defined an IP for my vserver.
> > > shouldn't the script check for this - before trying to set up the
> > > interface? No IP given - no interface set?
> > I don't believe it was ever invisioned--you really don't want to be running
> > your vserver on the same IP address on the host-server;
> why not?
> > kindof defeats the point.
> I can't see it defeats the point at all. My point for using vserver is
> to seperate the services I run on the same machine so if one gets hacked
> the others are not affected, and so that I from the "real" server can do
> file integrity checks that I can trust and thus now for sure if any
> vserver has been hacked/cracked.
why not use a local IP for the physical server
and the "real" ip for the virtual server(s)?