From: Bill Brigden (bill_at_baghead.co.uk)
Date: Tue 03 Dec 2002 - 16:21:58 GMT
Speaking as an observer - I think he is saying we need private network
loopback devices - ie. 127.0.0.1 within each vserver - so it is not shared
between other vservers - and not publicly available...
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Goerzen" <jgoerzen_at_complete.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:41 PM
Subject: [vserver] Re: merging into the mainstream kernel in the future
> In article <20021202234619.64d35fd4dd6d_at_remtk.solucorp.qc.ca>, Jacques
> > -We also need private network loopback devices.
> I think you're saying we need a way to have vservers communicate with each
> other internally using TCP/IP.
> They already can, thanks to the kernel's dummy driver. Just set an IP for
> the host, and one for each vserver, and they can all communicate with
> Of course, the problem is that vserver doesn't yet support multiple IP
> addresses from different subnets, so at the moment they can't communicate
> anyone else. I'm just saying, if that problem gets fixed, then you get
> one for free :-)