From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Sun 08 Dec 2002 - 21:50:56 GMT
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 01:11:04PM -0500, Matt Ayres wrote:
> Well, i'm already aware of both of these and am already using a
> pre-emptive kernel. Due to the changes it looks like the only way to do
> this quickly is just to remove the 'sched' code from the patch.
- are you interested in collaborating on this issue?
- if so, maybe we should contact Alexey Lyashkov?
- I would like to see per VS memory limits in CTX-15
(Alexey seems to have done that)
> Thanks anyway,
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:27:48AM -0500, Matt Ayres wrote:
> > > So i'm running into a situation here. I have a server running quite a few
> > > virtual servers with over 1000 processes on the host server. I am
> > > experiencing some performance problems, not so much on the virtual servers
> > > but any type of cpu intensive operation on the host server causes severe
> > > load.
> > have a look at ...
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/sched/ingo-O1/
> > but in your case, I would also take a look at ...
> > http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux/
> > best,
> > Herbert
> > > I know Lyashkov Alexey has ported the Vserver patch to work with RedHat
> > > 7.3 and the O(1) scheduler. Has anyone put any consideration or already
> > > done work to make a vserver+O(1) patch available for the official kernel?
> > >
> > > I'm going to try to attempt this using Lyashkov's as a base however I
> > > havn't used C in quite some years and have yet to do any kernel hacking :P
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matt Ayres