From: Jacques Gelinas (jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca)
Date: Mon 24 Feb 2003 - 18:59:40 GMT

• Previous message: Sam Vilain: "[vserver] O(1) s_context CPU scheduling, take two"
• In reply to: Jonathan Sambrook: "Re: [vserver] [Patch] Sysctrl interface config option and cloaking of ctx entries in /proc/self/status"
• Next in thread: Sam Vilain: "Re: [vserver] [Patch] Sysctrl interface config option and cloaking of ctx entries in /proc/self/status"

On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:40:02 -0500, Jonathan Sambrook wrote

> > > The ctx sysctl should itself be cloakable too.
> >
> > hmm, why not use a special capability to give
> > this kind of access, this would allow you to
> > enter a context with or without the ability
> > to get the extended /proc/self/status ...
>
> Sounds better.
>
> That's what the unused S_CTX_INFO_HIDEINFO in sched.h was intended for?

Yes

---------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Gelinas <jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc

• Previous message: Sam Vilain: "[vserver] O(1) s_context CPU scheduling, take two"
• In reply to: Jonathan Sambrook: "Re: [vserver] [Patch] Sysctrl interface config option and cloaking of ctx entries in /proc/self/status"
• Next in thread: Sam Vilain: "Re: [vserver] [Patch] Sysctrl interface config option and cloaking of ctx entries in /proc/self/status"