From: Sam Vilain (sam_at_vilain.net)
Date: Sun 09 Mar 2003 - 20:27:24 GMT
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 01:32, jon+vserver_at_silicide.dk wrote:
> > I've briefly investigated the three network filesystems designed to
> > replace NFS - AFS, Coda and Intermezzo, and to me AFS looked to be the
> > one most tested and promising.
> coda is AFS2. Both started on carnagee mellon, and then split. AFS
Yes, I realise that. But which has more support, and is available for more
operating systems ... it's got to be the ``original'' AFS.
> continued into transarc, and then into ibm, who published it under
> IBM public license. Coda continued as a research FS.
> Intermezzo is something other, i think intermezzo is a shared fs, where
> AFS is a distributed.
Intermezzo is like automated rsync :-). OK, but no good for a great number
of potential uses of a network FS.
-- Sam Vilain, sam_at_vilain.net
Time is an illusion perpetrated by the manufacturers of space. GRAFFITI