About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Herbert P÷tzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Thu 10 Jul 2003 - 13:44:51 BST


On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:32:15AM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Is anyone preparing patches/patchsets against AC kernels?
> i get conflicts in kernel/sched.c kernel/exit.c, and I think I won't be
> able to correctly resolve those with my level of expertise.

the big (and only) issue is the O(1) scheduler, which
has no ctx17 equivalent yet ...

> I am trying to get those features into my kernels:
> XFS + FreeSWAN + CIPE + Sensors ( + of course ctx17 ),

XFS doesn't have a working Immutable-Link-Inversion,
CIPE shouldn't be such a hazzle, and sensors are
included in my patchsets since Idonotknowwhenanymore ...

anyway, the encryption stuff will drastically change
in the next few months ... I guess

> and it seems like i'm alone in this pursuit, because everyone and their
> mother starts from including preemptive+low latency.(+o(1)).

so this means you dislike the above?

hmm, well low latency already made it into 2.4.22-pre3
and preemption as well as O(1) are in 2.5 and certainly
will be there in 2.6 ...

HTH,
Herbert


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Thu 10 Jul 2003 - 14:14:03 BST by hypermail 2.1.3