From: Herbert P÷tzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Thu 10 Jul 2003 - 13:44:51 BST
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:32:15AM +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Is anyone preparing patches/patchsets against AC kernels?
> i get conflicts in kernel/sched.c kernel/exit.c, and I think I won't be
> able to correctly resolve those with my level of expertise.
the big (and only) issue is the O(1) scheduler, which
has no ctx17 equivalent yet ...
> I am trying to get those features into my kernels:
> XFS + FreeSWAN + CIPE + Sensors ( + of course ctx17 ),
XFS doesn't have a working Immutable-Link-Inversion,
CIPE shouldn't be such a hazzle, and sensors are
included in my patchsets since Idonotknowwhenanymore ...
anyway, the encryption stuff will drastically change
in the next few months ... I guess
> and it seems like i'm alone in this pursuit, because everyone and their
> mother starts from including preemptive+low latency.(+o(1)).
so this means you dislike the above?
hmm, well low latency already made it into 2.4.22-pre3
and preemption as well as O(1) are in 2.5 and certainly
will be there in 2.6 ...