About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Alejandro Mery (amery_at_geeks.cl)
Date: Sat 19 Jul 2003 - 05:57:06 BST


Herbert P÷tzl wrote:

>On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:46:26PM -0400, Alejandro Mery Pellegrini wrote:
>
>
>>> Herbert P÷tzl wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:28:04PM -0400, Alejandro Mery wrote:
>>>>will ctx-18 support JFS?
>>>>
>>>>
>what does 'supporting jfs' mean for _you_
>(do _you_ consider it supported if ...)
>
>- the kernel can be compiled with jfs enabled?
>- the kernel woks with jfs and on jfs partitions?
>- immutable linkage invert is supported (unification)?
>- quota (virtual) is supported on jfs?
>
>so you are supposed to choose one, and I am
>then entitled to answer, 'yes of course', or
>'sorry dude, that won't work' *grin* ...
>
>
well... the question was:
can the kernel be *succesfully* compiled with jfs enabled? what didn't
happend a couple of month ago...

i assumed vquota patch was fs independent... but now i guess it isn't..
same about unification :-(
are vquota and unification supported on jfs?

Regards,
Alejandro Mery


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Sat 19 Jul 2003 - 06:22:53 BST by hypermail 2.1.3