From: Alejandro Mery (amery_at_geeks.cl)
Date: Sat 19 Jul 2003 - 05:57:06 BST
Herbert P÷tzl wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:46:26PM -0400, Alejandro Mery Pellegrini wrote:
>>> Herbert P÷tzl wrote:
>>>>On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:28:04PM -0400, Alejandro Mery wrote:
>>>>will ctx-18 support JFS?
>what does 'supporting jfs' mean for _you_
>(do _you_ consider it supported if ...)
>- the kernel can be compiled with jfs enabled?
>- the kernel woks with jfs and on jfs partitions?
>- immutable linkage invert is supported (unification)?
>- quota (virtual) is supported on jfs?
>so you are supposed to choose one, and I am
>then entitled to answer, 'yes of course', or
>'sorry dude, that won't work' *grin* ...
well... the question was:
can the kernel be *succesfully* compiled with jfs enabled? what didn't
happend a couple of month ago...
i assumed vquota patch was fs independent... but now i guess it isn't..
same about unification :-(
are vquota and unification supported on jfs?