From: James Morris (jmorris_at_redhat.com)
Date: Wed 01 Oct 2003 - 23:57:46 BST
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote:
> > I believe a reasonable portion of vserver can become a security module,
> > but there would clearly remain a need for some of the virtualization
> > (e.g. hostname, etc.).
> I definately want to have as much as possible of vserver
> using the normal security infrastructure, simply because
> it will save the vserver maintainers a lot of work ;)
I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of
it's own. It could be similar to LSM, e.g. allow pluggable
virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel.
-- James Morris <jmorris_at_redhat.com>