About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: James Morris (jmorris_at_redhat.com)
Date: Wed 01 Oct 2003 - 23:57:46 BST


On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> > I believe a reasonable portion of vserver can become a security module,
> > but there would clearly remain a need for some of the virtualization
> > (e.g. hostname, etc.).
>
> I definately want to have as much as possible of vserver
> using the normal security infrastructure, simply because
> it will save the vserver maintainers a lot of work ;)
>

I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of
it's own. It could be similar to LSM, e.g. allow pluggable
virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel.

- James

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris_at_redhat.com>


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Thu 02 Oct 2003 - 00:31:14 BST by hypermail 2.1.3