From: Alex Lyashkov (shadow_at_psoft.net)
Date: Wed 08 Oct 2003 - 13:38:21 BST
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 14:59, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 October 2003 03:34, Jacques Gelinas wrote:
> > > chrootsafe
> > >
> > > This is a new system call that unlike chroot, can't be escaped.
> > why don`t use private namespace ?
> Good question. Using CLONE_NEWNS followed by a recursive
> bind mount to hide everything else would be so much better
> than adding a new syscall.
Using CLONE_NEWNS do problems with umout after sys_pivot_root - see Herberts
post in linux-kernel@ but if create namespace manuality and change namespace
for process - problems be absent.
-- With best regards, Alex