From: Sam Vilain (sam_at_vilain.net)
Date: Tue 11 Nov 2003 - 15:43:08 GMT
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 06:56, Herbert Poetzl wrote;
  > I would like to add a 'generic' interface
  > to the next development release, which works
  > for O(1) as well as for non O(1), although
  > slightly different ... you've already implemented
  > a tuning syscall for your scheduler stuff, could
  > you make a first proposal how this syscall would
  > look like, and what you would like to 'adjust'
  > in future versions?
I can knock up what I think would be good; but ideally it should be
modeled as closely as possible after the CKRM syscalls.  Right now I
don't have the time to do that research unfortunately...
Here's the details of the syscall currently;
struct  vcmd_set_sched_v1 {
        uint32_t ctxnum;
/* this is the context number to operate on, which currently must be
   the same as the current context */
        uint32_t options;
/* Options - this is a bitwise field performing admin stuff.
   #define TBF_SCHED_ENABLE	0x0001
   #define TBF_SCHED_DISABLE	0x0002
   This should be adequate for denoting other types of scheduling,
   should the whole integration with CKRM thing not work out.  */
  /* The rest of the fields are specific to the fact that it is a TBF
     algorithm being used.  Note that the algorithm could apply
     equally well to a non-O(1) scheduler, but honestly - what's the
     point of inplementing that ?  :-) This data area should probably
     be a (possibly variable length) `union' of the tunables for all
     the available types of scheduling. */
        int fill_rate;
        int period;
        int fill_level;
        int bucket_size;
};
Other things that I might like to add later;
   a) `hard luck' scheduling - a per-vserver flag that only allocates
      a maximum number of jiffies to a context as they have tokens
      left, and when they are `empty', immediately stop the process
      and put them on the end of the inactive runqueue.  This would
      effectively stop a vserver from getting allocated cycles if they
      have no tokens, but if everything is `running on empty' they
      will still get 1 jiffie slices allocated.
   b) `hard' scheduling - a per-vserver flag that _prevents_ the
      vserver from getting allocated cycles if they have no tokens.
      ie, no tokens = less priority than the idle process.
   c) some mechanism for reading the current values for a particular
      context, without all that hassle of parsing /proc/X/status, so
      that a manager process could watch what was going on and take
      action, record total tokens used (or read the total kept
      internally), etc.
Other things I originally intended, eg CBQ for vservers are probably
made unnecessary by CKRM.
-- Sam Vilain, sam_at_vilain.net"Revolution is the opiate of the intellectuals" - "Oh, Lucky Man" -
_______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver