From: Fritz Kron (fritz.kron_at_domaintechnik.at)
Date: Fri 12 Dec 2003 - 15:06:14 GMT
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:11:43 +0100
Herbert Poetzl <herbert_at_13thfloor.at> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:17:24PM +0100, Fritz Kron wrote:
> > Hello,
> Hi Fritz!
> > We just got the v1.21 patched kernel up (debian) and are
> > very interested in diffs to get the 0.29 tools running.
> > BTW. ? whats about the bugs in V1.2 Jonathan Sambrook wrote
> > patches for, is v1.21 realy stable or is it just alot of
> > work compiling and installing the stuff for crashing the server?
> 1.20/21 does contain a bugfix Jonathan and I did, it
> does not contain the sem replacement Jonathan posted
> yesterday ;)
that means 1.21 should work quite stable and will not be outdated in some weeks?
> > What is the meaning of "STABLE" - some kind of testing versions?
> what is the meaning of "testing version"? something the
> people don't even look at, because they stick to the
> 'stable' releases?
> how do you think, vserver should evolve?
It seems changes and releases are done a little bit too fast, which version do you suggest to use for production environment? (nameserver, customers etc)
> if 'stable' for you means that the code is bugfree, you
> have to do a logical proof for it, this can be done for
> 20-30 lines of code, welcome to the real world ...
> every 'bug' I'm informed of, will be fixed as soon as
> possible, that's exactly what we did for vs1.21, if
> you think ctx-17 is more stable, or ctx-12 or whatever,
> please feel free to use that version or none at all ...
Sure there will be bugs in newly written code and
after some bugfixes and testing it gets often ;) more "Stable".
What are the future plans for vserver?
Is there a team of developers working together making releases
or will there be a lot of different releases from each developer one?
You guys make good work so far, thank you!
> > kind regards Fritz
> > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:49:31 +0100
> > "Thomas Gebhardt" <gebhardt_at_hrz.uni-marburg.de> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > has anyone already made patches for making .deb files from the
> > > vserver 0.29 tools? The last patch on ftp.debian.org is
> > > vserver_0.26-2.diff.gz and does not apply cleanly to the
> > > 0.29 sources. Some debian patches already got merged into 0.29,
> > > and some other stuff has changed, so it requires some manual
> > > fixes and insight to get things right. If anyone has already
> > > done the hard part, I'd hesitate to do the work again :-)
> > >
> > > Thanks, Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Vserver mailing list
> > > Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Vserver mailing list
> > Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> Vserver mailing list
Vserver mailing list