From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Thu 18 Dec 2003 - 16:51:48 GMT

• Previous message: Herbert Poetzl: "Re: [Vserver] Re: [parisc-linux] syscall number for vserver"
• In reply to: Allen Parker: "[Vserver] 2.6.0 is new *stable* kernel thoughts/ideas?"
• Next in thread: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: [Vserver] 2.6.0 is new *stable* kernel thoughts/ideas?"
• Reply: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: [Vserver] 2.6.0 is new *stable* kernel thoughts/ideas?"

On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:22:15PM -0500, Allen Parker wrote:
> Herbert, are we going to be moving ahead with
> 2.6.x kernel patches or no?

hmm, sure we are going to work/develop 2.6 stuff
(if that is what you mean) but I don't see 2.6
(neither kernel nor vserver) ready for use yet ...

please elaborate ...

best,
Herbert

> Allen Dale Parker
> allenp_at_efn.org
>
> "ego sum ens ompnipotens"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

• Previous message: Herbert Poetzl: "Re: [Vserver] Re: [parisc-linux] syscall number for vserver"
• In reply to: Allen Parker: "[Vserver] 2.6.0 is new *stable* kernel thoughts/ideas?"
• Next in thread: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: [Vserver] 2.6.0 is new *stable* kernel thoughts/ideas?"
• Reply: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: [Vserver] 2.6.0 is new *stable* kernel thoughts/ideas?"