From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Thu 18 Dec 2003 - 18:05:54 GMT
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:45:10PM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> > hmm, sure we are going to work/develop 2.6 stuff
> > (if that is what you mean) but I don't see 2.6
> My, oh my, "stable" terminology bit you in the a**?
yeah, and it _did_ hurt ;)
> Linux developers release "stable" kernel with missing
> features list like from here to the moon.
hmm, we can do that too, if this is where we want to go ...
> Although I must admit that your "stable" vserver
> seems way more stable then "stable" kernel.
I take this as a complement for vserver development ...
> I'm going to trademark "stable software inflation" term...;)
hmm, wouldn't 'constant change' be more apropriate here? ;)
> Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
> Namagumi namagomi namagoroshi
> Vserver mailing list
Vserver mailing list