From: Alex Lyashkov (umka_at_sevinter.net)
Date: Thu 04 Mar 2004 - 09:25:52 GMT

• Previous message: Богдан: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."
• In reply to: Богдан: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."
• Next in thread: Богдан: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."
• Next in thread: Herbert Poetzl: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."
• Reply: Богдан: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."

В Чтв, 04.03.2004, в 11:13, Богдан пишет:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:35:53 +0100
> Dariush Pietrzak <eyck_at_ghost.anime.pl> wrote:
>
> > > 1'st - it was not a fork bomb. I expected that -t 5 will give to vserver
> > > no mo then 10% of CPU time
> > Why would '-t 5' limit cpu usage to 10%? What patches are you using for
> > that?
>
> Hi. None. It was my mistake. man bash is very ppor about ulimits... :( Still trying to find solution.
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Try "CPU CAP".

-- 
Alex Lyashkov <umka_at_sevinter.net>
Home
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

• Previous message: Богдан: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."
• In reply to: Богдан: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."
• Next in thread: Богдан: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."
• Next in thread: Herbert Poetzl: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."
• Reply: Богдан: "Re: [Vserver] Ulimt's seems to fail."