About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Mon 03 Jan 2005 - 00:04:17 GMT


On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:43:31PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Pavel Machek <pavel_at_ucw.cz> writes:
>
> > 1) seems acceptable, as long as 64bits is enough.
>
> That cries for an extensible interface.

I guess using an array (with at compile time fixed size)
of __u32 (or maybe __u64 on 64bit archs) would be a good
solution to make it 'compatible' with the current interface
(for the lower 32 bit) and allow to use an interface which
can handle arbitrary sizes for the 'new' syscall interface

best,
Herbert

> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab_at_suse.de
> SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Mon 03 Jan 2005 - 00:04:49 GMT by hypermail 2.1.3