From: Lars E. D. Jensen (lars_at_dangvard.dk)
Date: Thu 17 Feb 2005 - 13:23:00 GMT
> > patching file mm/mmap.c
> > Hunk #3 FAILED at 1353.
> > Hunk #4 FAILED at 1368.
> > Hunk #5 FAILED at 1418.
> > Hunk #6 FAILED at 1434.
> > Hunk #7 succeeded at 1573 (offset 31 lines).
> > Hunk #8 succeeded at 1813 (offset 31 lines).
> > Hunk #9 succeeded at 1842 (offset 37 lines).
> > Hunk #10 succeeded at 1871 (offset 37 lines).
> > Hunk #11 succeeded at 1907 (offset 37 lines).
> > 4 out of 11 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/mmap.c.rej
>
> yes, the patch-2.6.10-vs1.9.4.diff is for vanilla kernels
> (from kernel.org) which should work quite fine with debian
> but I'm sure somebody has already adapted the patch for
> the debian source (which is probably more like 2.6.11-rc*)
I think I'll stick to the vanilla kernel.
>
> > I know there's a kernel-patch-ctx for Debian, but this is only 1.29
> > vserver patch.
>
> please file a request to the debian maintainer(s) ...
I've read in another thread that the reason why the 1.9.x branch isn't in the
unstable/testing Debian yet... is that it's still in development.
But the someone in that thread also said that a "kernel patch" might not apply
to normal Debian policy very good, which I partly agree with.
> > Is someone doing the 1.9.4 like a Debian package which applies to
> > kernel-source-2.6.10 - Linux kernel source for version 2.6.10 with Debian
> > patches ?
> >
> > Or have an idea how to apply the patch.
>
> look into the rejects and fix them yourself?
If I only knew how :)
-- Med venlig hilsen / Best regards Lars E. D. Jensen lars_at_dangvard.dk _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver