From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Mon 11 Apr 2005 - 20:26:53 BST
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:55:44PM -0400, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> Excellent! Is NG going to be part of it?
no, we decided against that for the 2.0 branch which
will allow us to put it into 2.1 immediately after
2.0 is out/done ... so anybody interested in those
new features will use the devel branch (2.1) all
other will stick to the stable 2.0 ... similar to
the way it was with 1.2/1.3 ...
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> >Greetings Folks!
> >we had a longer discussion last night and we came to
> >the conclusion that this is the right time to start
> >working on a stable 2.0 release (for 2.6.x)
> >so while this will involve a lot of work and testing
> >in various places this also means that there will
> >be some kind of feature freeze for the 2.0 release
> >candidates and we would like to ask you to participate
> >in testing those release candidates and feed back
> >whatever you consider important for the stable release
> >we will also try to get a 'stable' release of the
> >alpha util-vserver done, so consider both, kernel and
> >tools as the upcoming 2.0 release ...
> >we expect first release candidates to show up in one
> >or two weeks, depending on the amount of immediate
> >feedback to the email ...
> >Vserver mailing list
> Vserver mailing list
Vserver mailing list