From: Björn Steinbrink (B.Steinbrink_at_gmx.de)
Date: Thu 26 May 2005 - 20:20:58 BST
On 2005.05.26 17:22:16 +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > Greetings Community!
> > a fortnight after the first one, here is the second
> > release candidate for the stable 2.6 series ...
> > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-184.108.40.206-vs2.0-rc2.diff
> > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-220.127.116.11-vs2.0-rc2.diff.bz2
> > please give it some testing, and let me know if there
> > is anything which requires mending, if nothing is
> > reported this might become the final 2.0 release ...
> And for 2.6.12-rc5:
Great! Also did a port to check for differences. Of course my port has
the nr_tids++ bug again ;) The others were some comments which didn't get
removed in your patch. My patch is at:
(Didn't get a test compile/boot yet, but I trust your port to work and
the differences are neglible in that regard [well except the nr_tids++] ;)
Btw, did you get any feedback on the nr_tids++ thing yet?
Vserver mailing list