>
> OPINION POLL
> ============
>
> please check (X) all points which apply ...
> (according to your opinion)
>
> [ ] I had no idea about this issue/deficiency
> [X] I did already know about it
>
> [ ] I'm already using BME (or similar) patches
> [X] I will start using BME patches now
> [ ] I do not need/use this 'feature' at all
>
> [X] I think this SHOULD get into the next
> stable Linux-VServer release because ...
>
> [ ] I am using it/want to use it
> [X] It's more a bugfix than a feature
> [X] I like the idea of ro --bind mounts
>
> [ ] I think this should NOT be included into
> the next stable release because ...
>
> [ ] it is not thoroughly tested
> [ ] it is not mature enough
> [ ] it adds unnecessary code
> [ ] it should better be fixed in
> the mainline Linux Kernel
>
The silent dishonor of the the ro-option is definitly a bug, so the bugfix
should go into the kernel mainline anyway. BUT, for Linux-VServer I think
this is vital, therefore we should have this asap in the next stable
Linux-Vserver release, which will hopefully be before the introduction into
the kernel-mainline.
The other essential feature in the next stable release should be
CoW-link-breaking I think.
-- Wilhelm Meier email: meier@informatik.fh-kl.de _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserverReceived on Sat Jan 7 09:43:34 2006