Re: [vserver] transient network drops

From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert_at_13thfloor.at>
Date: Tue 04 Sep 2007 - 15:19:19 BST
Message-ID: <20070904141918.GB10006@MAIL.13thfloor.at>

On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 03:47:04PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 03:37:23PM +0200, Tom Laermans wrote:
>
> > Ehm, if you have 2 onboard NICs it would be very odd manufacturing
> > process if they didn't follow up.
>
> Yes -- that machine has an nforce and a broadcom NIC (and even
> a third, a Tyan SMDC NIC which shares its physical interface).
>
> The successor model, the X2100 M2 has four onboard NICs (five,
> with the SMDC) which are also numbered consecutively (...9A,...9B,
> ...98, ...99).
>
> I happen to be testing the X2100 M2 with Debian AMD64 stable
> (etch, currently), using 2.6.18-5-vserver-amd64, and stock
> util-vserver, which seems to be version 0.30.212 at the moment.

you might want to upgrade to a more recent version

> Anyone tested that model with 8 GByte physical memory? I only
> have access to 4 GByte at this time.

on x86_64 8GB should 'just' work better than 4GB,
no issues to expect there (except maybe for thermal
issues if the ram is clocked too high :)

best,
Herbert

> --
> Eugen* Leitl leitl http://leitl.org
> ______________________________________________________________
> ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
> 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Received on Tue Sep 4 15:19:31 2007

[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Tue 04 Sep 2007 - 15:19:35 BST by hypermail 2.1.8