Dennis Muhlestein wrote:
>> well, if you allow processes to assume realtime
>> priority (which you do with SYS_NICE) you should
>> be aware that such a process can lock your kernel
>> by simply not giving up the CPU anymore ...
>
> Would this not be the same if the process were running on a host OS as
> apposed to a guest?
exactly, and there is no problem as long as you pay attention of not
overloadig the host by consolidating too many cpu-hogging services
from X real servers into X vservers on one host :)
cheers,
raoul
-- ____________________________________________________________________ DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. r.bhatia@ipax.at Technischer Leiter IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OEG web. http://www.ipax.at Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. office@ipax.at 1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030 FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15 ____________________________________________________________________Received on Wed Oct 17 16:50:10 2007