On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 13:46 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:50:27PM +0200, Claus Herwig wrote:
> > Hello,
>
<snip>
> this is the last stable version, which had extensive
> code review and testing .. unfortunately the community
> is not willing to sponsor a similar review and testing
> for a more recent kernel (e.g. 2.6.27.x) so for the
> forseeable future, it will stay the 'last stable' release
>
<snip>
> > Why is it called experimental?
>
> everything without a code review and extensive testing is
> called "development" or "experimental", everything known to
> be missing some features or functionality is labeled
> "experimental" ... I don't think that those labels keep
> folks from running it in production very similar to the
> debian releases ...
<snip>
I'm afraid we can't help with code review but what can we do to help
with testing? We are heavily using 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Thanks - John
-- John A. Sullivan III Open Source Development Corporation +1 207-985-7880 jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com http://www.spiritualoutreach.com Making Christianity intelligible to secular societyReceived on Tue Aug 11 13:44:35 2009