Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> [...]
>
> options IMHO are:
>
> - 2.6.32.x (has performance issues, but is long term)
> - 2.6.38.x (good performance, not longterm yet)
> - 3.0.x (immature, but the future)
My vote is for 3.0. I will likely keep maintaining my RHEL6-based
2.6.32 kernel and backport the majority of changes done for the
stabilization there.
-- Daniel Hokka ZakrissonReceived on Mon Aug 1 21:41:24 2011