Re: [vserver] Stable Linux-VServer Release

From: Lukasz Czarnowski <relaks_at_o2.pl>
Date: Wed 03 Aug 2011 - 12:59:32 BST
Message-ID: <38336d56.78203644.4e393824.6cc07@o2.pl>

On 2 08 2011 19:17 Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com> wrote:

> Exactly. I'm currently running .32 and .38 on my servers, but as they
> are "satisfactory" today, I would have no particular desire to see them
> improved further. If I bought new hardware or had a desire to change
> the running kernel then it would be because I needed some new feature in
> 3.x or whatever
>
> I think a few folks are still saying .32 because it's what they are
> running today (that's what I'm running also). However, remember you
> need to think about what you want to run in 1-2 years time... (this
> doesn't mean you Adrian, just trying to influence people generally!)

Sure.

Daniel suggested a good solution:

> My vote is for 3.0. I will likely keep maintaining my RHEL6-based
> 2.6.32 kernel and backport the majority of changes done for the
> stabilization there.

Best regards,

-- 
Lukasz Czarnowski
Received on Wed Aug 3 12:59:52 2011
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Wed 03 Aug 2011 - 12:59:52 BST by hypermail 2.1.8