Too bad Roberto doesn't want to be there to support vserver (NG) anymore, but I would have a backup to fill the resulting gap! So, let's go on!Regards, Thorsten
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------Von: Roberto Puzzanghera <admin@sagredo.eu> Datum: 21.06.22 18:28 (GMT+01:00) An: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org Betreff: Re: [vserver] funding the 5.10 vserver goal Hello everyone, not having had any news since last year I have abandoned linux-vserver. I therefore regret not being able to participate in the funding.Il 2022-06-20 12:40 Thorsten Edler ha scritto:> Hi folks,> > I want to ask, what's about the state of our little funding campaign> for vserver kernel/patches to 5.10/5.15? Is there some "work in> progress" or any result at the horizon?> > Or: Would be @Ben Green an adequate contact person for this issue?> > Regards,> /Thorsten> > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------> Von: Adrian Butterworth <adrian@economicoutlook.net>> Datum: 09.11.21 02:07 (GMT+01:00)> An: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org> Cc: Ghislain Adnet <gadnet@aqueos.com>> Betreff: Re: [vserver] funding the 5.10 vserver goal> > Hi all> > EO is fine with 5.15.> > With a bit of luck it may get a few more years added, else we can> raise funds> (Herbert willing) for the next one that does.> > regards> Adrian> > On Thu, November 4, 2021 22:29, Ghislain Adnet wrote:>> Le 03/11/2021 à 16:11, Ghislain Adnet a écrit :>>> >>> Economic Outlook 500 => 5.10>>> aqueos 2500 => 5.15>>> roberto 200 => no preferences>>> Tor Rune Skoglund 1000 => 5.15>>> Sandino Araico Sánchez 500 => 5.15>>> Thorsten Edler 250 => 5.15>>> roman 50 => ?>> >> seems i was hasty.>> >> Thanks for Tor Rune Skoglund for corecting me here, the consensus is> toward>> 5.15 LTS and i welcome it ! :)>> >> Adrian and Roman, do you have any issue if we go this route ?>> >> >> -->> cordialement,>> Ghislain ADNET.>> AQUEOS.>> >>
Received on Tue Jun 21 18:37:30 2022