[00:34] Doener (~doener@pD9E1277D.dip.t-dialin.net) joined #vserver. [00:34] hi all! [00:44] Simon (~sgarner@apollo.quattro.net.nz) joined #vserver. [00:48] Nick change: Bertl_oO -> Bertl [00:48] hi folks! [00:49] hi bertl [00:52] Anyone here work for the telephone company and have access to who owns what number? [00:52] Such as the ARIN database for IP's. [00:55] hmm, there are CD-Roms containing the # -> person database (at least here in europe ;) [00:56] hmm [00:56] or do you mean # -> phone company [00:56] Every number, or just people in the telephone books? [00:56] # -> person [00:57] phone company changes too easily now here in US. every number is portable accross carriers [00:57] well unlisted numbers will not be listed, wont they? [00:58] That's what I am trying to do at the moment, identify the owners of an unlisted number [00:59] hmm, isn't that illegal? [01:00] it would be against company regulations to give out unlisted information, but I don't think it's illegal [01:02] yes [01:03] hmm, why not 'just' call that number? [01:45] Simon, you around today? [02:20] :e [02:20] re [02:20] hi maja! [02:21] ok, serial cable is plugged in [02:21] now i need to read how to start a getty on my serial port [02:21] nope [02:21] all you do is the following: enable serial console in the kernel config [02:21] ok [02:22] and add console=ttyS0,115200n8 [02:22] to the boot line ... [02:22] on the other end you use minicom ... [02:22] on grub, to the kernel /.... root=... line, am i right? [02:22] configuration 115200 baud 8 bits 1 stop parity=none, hw hanshake yes ... [02:22] yup that line ... [02:25] ok, rebuilding [02:28] while i rebuild the kernel, i've got two questions regarding server rescues [02:28] go ahead ... [02:28] first, if i connect two servers via serial cable to have an emergency console i can use [02:29] do i need 2 cables? [02:29] so if server 1 goes down, i can connect from server2 [02:29] and vice versa [02:29] or is it possible to use 1 cable? [02:30] and has grub the possibility to controll it via serial cable? [02:30] because i do not know what to do if hda failes, where i boot from [02:31] yes, both is possible ... [02:31] ok, i guess i will do a little googling then [02:31] although you might use two cables ro 'cross' connect the servers for the very unlikely case where a power outage boots them at the same time ;) [02:32] for grub, you can simply specify the possible consoles, it will use all of them ;) [02:32] ok [02:40] re [02:40] my pc rebooted :) [02:40] (workstation) [02:41] its not good to switch a monitor that often, so you press your vga card out of the slot... [02:41] hmm true 8-) [02:41] (i forgot to add a screw to it) [02:45] you said i should use minicon? [02:45] is that one for windows? [02:47] minicom, no it's for unix/linux ... [02:47] who uses windows?! [02:48] me ;) [02:48] i like those nifty games [02:48] well then find your nifty vt100 terminal emulation ;) [02:48] ill try to look, if putty supports that :D [02:50] ok, no putty for that [02:50] doesn't the windows telnet client have vt100 emu? [02:51] yes, but i don't know how to access the serial port ;) [02:51] Use hyperterminal [02:51] That's in windows itself. [02:51] hyperterm :) [02:51] Or use SecureCRT. [02:52] mhm, i guess i press reset and look what it does ;) [02:52] should i be able to press some keys? [02:54] cause i receive an empty screen [02:54] hmm, well or 'just' boot into linux and use minicom ;) [02:54] the serial ports are always enabled? [02:55] because i usually disable everything i do not need :) [02:55] well, you can disable them in the bios ... [02:55] so my linux machines come with no usb/parport/... support [02:55] is it possible to use the comport from inside a vserver? [02:56] yes sure, but why do you want dto do that? [02:56] because i've got a vserver at home, which i trash with different programms and packages [02:57] so the host system stays clean [02:58] hmm, how many machines do you have? [02:58] i guess, that the comport which is closest to the ps2 ports is com1? [02:59] usually they are labeled A/B or 1/2 [02:59] A=1= ttyS0 [02:59] currently, i got 1 windows machine and 3 linux servers [02:59] so why use the windows machine for the serial link?! [03:00] my old router, my new router (which hast to be fully configured yet) and the server [03:00] i allready switched to the linux server [03:00] ah okay, so this is solved, right? [03:00] yes [03:01] i've got no /dev/vttyS0 on my vserver :) [03:01] well, using the host now [03:01] devfs or hand made /dev? [03:02] hand made [03:02] ill install devfs afterwards [03:02] /dev/ttyS0 should be there ... [03:02] as well as cua/cub [03:02] well, it isnt ;) [03:03] i only got [03:03] full/initctl/log/null/ptmx/pts/random/reboot/shm/ttyp/urandom/xconsole/zero [03:03] on my vserver [03:03] anyways [03:03] what do i need to pass to minicom? [03:04] jsut start it with -so [03:04] then select serial port setup ... [03:04] A - Serial Device : /dev/ttyS0 [03:04] B - Lockfile Location : /var/lock [03:04] C - Callin Program : [03:04] D - Callout Program : [03:04] E - Bps/Par/Bits : 115200 8N1 [03:04] F - Hardware Flow Control : Yes [03:05] G - Software Flow Control : No [03:05] ok [03:05] and in the modem/dialing setup [03:06] remove the strings A-H [03:06] done [03:06] then either select safe setup as default or as name ... [03:06] and then exit ... [03:06] make sure your terminal has at least 80x25 ... [03:07] most terminal open at 80x24 ;) [03:07] (in which case you would lose the status line ;) [03:08] i use putty, lots of space there :> [03:09] on exit, i get a "cannot open /dev/ttyS0" [03:09] CosmicRay (~jgoerzen@glockenspiel.complete.org) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds [03:09] mhm [03:09] crw-rw---- 1 root dialout 4, 64 Mar 14 2002 /dev/ttyS0 [03:10] okay, so you probably really managed to configure the serial port away, ether by bios or kernel options ... [03:10] maybe there is a module to load? [03:10] i got monolithic kernels [03:10] hmm, well, then I guess not ... [03:10] is the problem with the server or the client [03:10] or could it be either one [03:11] only the machine the minicom runs on atm ... [03:11] could be a permission problem? [03:12] ok [03:12] i guess it was a perm problem [03:12] Welcome to minicom 2.1 [03:12] OPTIONS: History Buffer, F-key Macros, Search History Buffer, I18n [03:12] Compiled on Nov 12 2003, 19:21:57. [03:12] Press CTRL-A Z for help on special keys [03:12] CTRL-A Z for help |115200 8N1 | NOR | Minicom 2.1 | VT102 | Offline [03:13] okay, that looks better ... [03:13] is the cable connected? [03:13] yes [03:14] hmm, you should see an online there ... but maybe the other side doesn't connect yet ... [03:14] let's test this ... [03:15] s0:23:respawn:/sbin/mgetty -s 115200 -r -p "@: " -i /etc/issue.line /dev/tts/0 [03:15] add this line on the server (other end) [03:15] in the /etc/inittab [03:16] done [03:16] and activate the changes with telinit Q [03:16] hmm you might actually touch the /etc/issue.line before ;) [03:17] and make sure that mgetty is installed ... [03:17] done [03:17] root 445 0.2 0.0 1744 656 ? S 03:18 0:00 /sbin/mgetty -s 115200 -r -p @: -i /etc/issue.line /dev/tts/0 [03:17] CTRL-A Z for help |115200 8N1 | NOR | Minicom 2.1 | VT102 | Online 00:00 [03:17] hey it's working ;) [03:18] wheee \o/ [03:18] press enter ... [03:18] woot [03:18] hehe [03:18] nice [03:18] red.ipax.tk login: [03:18] okay, that's the normal console ... this doesn't interfere with the debug/boot stuff, so you can leave it in ... [03:19] you can always use that to reconfigure the network for example ;) [03:19] thoughts like these came to my mind [03:19] or enter the rescue partition ... [03:19] pretty nice actually [03:19] i think ill play around with that [03:19] after the work is done ;) [03:20] i just noticed, that my hyperterm received stuff while i was installing minicom [03:20] md1: sync done and stuff [03:20] Doener (~doener@pD9E1277D.dip.t-dialin.net) left irc: Quit: Leaving [03:20] anyways [03:20] okay, you added the boot line to the grub config? [03:21] yes [03:22] kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.24-vs1.23-2.95 root=/dev/md0 console=ttyS0,115200n8 [03:25] looks good ... [03:25] now modify the grub config file ... [03:26] serial --unit=0 --speed=115200 [03:26] terminal --timeout=5 serial [03:26] add that at the top ... [03:27] k [03:28] then reboot the machine ... [03:28] during the actual reboot, your minicom should show Offline, and then Online again ... [03:29] then grub asks for a key/selection . [03:29] yes [03:29] hehe [03:29] somehow, i'm really fascinated by that [03:29] i can't tell [03:29] really [03:29] :) [03:31] okay, now have you booted the kernel? [03:32] yes [03:32] try CTRL-a-z-f [03:32] and then h [03:32] SysRq : HELP : loglevel0-8 reBoot tErm kIll saK showMem showPc unRaw Sync showTasks Unmount [03:33] hmm actually CTRL-z should do, but usually I use a screen ;) [03:33] but that is the magic sysreq, you should already know ;) [03:33] hehe [03:34] i use screen too [03:34] all the time [03:34] but i guess i will go to the toilet ... [03:34] before the hard work start [03:34] s [03:35] okay, machine is ready for testing ... if it 'hangs' you should be able to use sysreq-P and sysreq-T to investigate ... [03:35] well, i do not know what to test ;) [03:35] brb [03:36] IIRC, you where able to crash the vs1.23 kernel (compiled with 2.95/96?) more than once, that would be quite interesting [03:48] re [03:48] so [03:48] shall i login and crash the server? [03:48] yeah, but do not login via the console for that purpose ... [03:49] ok [03:49] keep the console for your investigations ;) [03:50] crashed [03:51] okay use the sysreq-p and then sysreq-t [03:51] so [03:51] ctrl-z-f-p? [03:51] you might need to adjust the scrollback buffer first ... [03:52] SysRq : [03:52] screen/keyboard history ... [03:53] ok, i told putty to keep 10000 lines [03:54] hmm, that is possible? [03:54] though somehow i now lost everything inside the windows with minicom :) [03:54] IIRC there are only 4 digits ;) [03:55] lines of scrooback: 10000 [03:55] whatever [03:55] i do not know how i get something out of that window [03:55] /server [03:55] CTRL-a-z-f-h [03:56] nothing [03:56] or better CTRL-a z f h [03:56] yeah [03:56] after f, it tells "sending blank" [03:56] and then i press h [03:56] nothing anymoure [03:56] break I hope ... [03:56] ok [03:56] yes [03:56] hehe [03:57] it disappears too fast to read it properly [03:57] well, that means that your system doesn't handle the magic sysrq ... [03:57] which further points to a hardware issue?! [03:57] mhm [03:57] i had the sysrq stuff displayed before [03:57] maybe putty/.. messed something up? [03:58] could it be that your cpus overheat very fast? [03:58] no [03:58] not that i think so [03:58] i stressed the server from yesterday around 3 until midnight [03:58] 4 paralell kernel compiles [03:58] load avg 3.4-3.9 [03:58] 63 and 61 degrees celcius as i quit [03:59] hmm, strange ... doesn't look like a typical kernel issue to me ... [03:59] btw: fear my proper english: "not that i think so" [03:59] well, ill reboot [03:59] and do that -p again [04:00] minicom was still online [04:00] btw [04:00] as i press reset, it's offline [04:01] hmm, maybe you should try with a non-vserver kernel, and start a fork bomb (or even killer) just to see how that looks like? [04:02] i could try that [04:02] missed the grub screen [04:02] second reset [04:03] change the 5 seconds to 25 on the next boot ... [04:03] ok: ctrl-a-f-break-h -> [04:03] SysRq : HELP : loglevel0-8 reBoot tErm kIll saK showMem showPc unRaw Sync showTasks Unmount [04:03] ./killer [04:04] press 8 [04:04] it hangs [04:04] now? [04:04] without anything? [04:04] no aon the help [04:04] this is now with vanilla or vs1.23 again? [04:04] vs1.23 [04:04] mhm [04:05] Last message repeated 1 time(s). [04:05] ctrl-a-f-break-h is not working anymore?! [04:05] i shall enter: [04:05] ctrl-a-f-break-h [04:05] and then 8? [04:05] or 8 on the minicom help screen [04:05] like after pressing ctrl-a [04:05] well, actually you might add a '8' after ctrl-a-f-break-h [04:06] which sets the loglevel to 8 [04:06] well, i get no response... [04:06] that is the interesting part ;) [04:06] nothing gets sent back on pressing ctrl-a-z-f-h [04:07] okay, lets try with a vanilla 2.4.24 ... [04:07] i have to compile one [04:07] shouldn't take too long ... right? [04:07] but i've got a 2.4.24-ck1, which i will use afterwards [04:07] is that ok too? [04:07] or should it be vanilla [04:07] ah, i have to enable sysreq [04:08] yeah would be better ck1 changes too much ... [04:08] i go for a vanilla one [04:08] this gets a little boring because nothing happens ;) [04:15] well, you can pipe the kernel compile output into xmms, this gives great music ;) [04:17] rebooting [04:19] ok [04:19] ill run the fork bomb [04:19] ok? [04:19] okay ... [04:19] SysRq : HELP : loglevel0-8 reBoot tErm kIll saK showMem showPc unRaw Sync showTasks Unmount [04:19] running [04:19] ./forkbomb.sh: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable [04:19] :) [04:20] what next [04:20] try the killer script ... ignore the fact that it can't change with this kernel ... [04:20] during the forkbomb? [04:20] mhm [04:21] lets see [04:21] :) [04:21] ok [04:21] it "should" be running [04:22] sometomes the "./forkbomb.sh: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable [04:22] is broken by something [04:22] but im not able to see it [04:22] ctx: -1 [04:22] it says [04:23] hmm seems okay .. and it seems stable ... strange ... [04:23] try to activate the sysreq now [04:24] ctrl-z-a-f-h [04:24] SysRq : HELP : loglevel0-8 reBoot tErm kIll saK showMem showPc unRaw Sync showTasks Unmount [04:24] SysRq : Show Regs [04:24] Pid: 1, comm: init [04:24] EIP: 0010:[] CPU: 0 EFLAGS: 00000287 Not tainted [04:24] EAX: 000000ff EBX: f6ac6000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: c031e8c0 [04:24] ESI: cf864000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: c1c3ff18 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 [04:24] so it works here ... [04:24] CR0: 8005003b CR2: 4018646c CR3: 37da1000 CR4: 000006d0 [04:24] Call Trace: [] [] [] [] [] [04:25] yes [04:25] wow [04:25] -t shows _a lot_ of content [04:25] lots of forkbomb.sh [04:25] :D [04:25] hmm ... okay, lets try to start the killer on vs1.23 (gcc 2.95/96 right?) [04:26] via the serial console ... [04:26] ok [04:26] ad your gcc 2.95 question [04:27] any possibility to be real sure that it is 2.95? [04:27] really [04:27] i changed the two lines in the Makefile [04:27] sure, use strings on the kernel and grep for linux [04:27] ok [04:28] strings /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.24-vs1.23-2.95 |grep linux [04:28] linux: fatal error: A20 gate not responding! [04:28] /home/raoul/src/linux-2.4.24/include/asm/spinlock.h [04:28] /home/raoul/src/linux-2.4.24/include/linux/highmem.h [04:28] strings kernel | grep 2.4.24 [04:28] seems better ... [04:29] 2.4.24-vs1.23-2.95 (root@red.ipax.tk) #3 SMP Thu Jan 15 02:27:30 CET 2004 [04:29] /home/raoul/src/linux-2.4.24/include/asm/spinlock.h [04:29] /home/raoul/src/linux-2.4.24/include/linux/highmem.h [04:29] but i named my kernel that way [04:29] hmm, right ... okay [04:29] (2.4.24-vs1.23-2.95 [04:29] the info is there somewhere ... let me check ... [04:31] ah okay, boot it, and use cat /proc/version ... [04:31] ok [04:31] red:/home/raoul# cat /proc/version [04:31] Linux version 2.4.24-vs1.23-2.95 (root@red.ipax.tk) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)) #3 SMP Thu Jan 15 02:27:30 CET 2004 [04:31] good to know [04:31] ok [04:31] i'll start the killer from the serial line [04:32] ctrl-a-z-f-p works (nothing started yet) [04:33] i compiled the killer with gcc-3.3 [04:33] but i guess that has nothing to do with that [04:33] or am i wrong? [04:34] still running [04:34] load average: 50.67, 17.04, 6.12 [04:35] starting another killer [04:35] wtf? [04:35] why did it crash before? [04:35] ok [04:35] crash [04:35] hehe [04:35] no respond to ctrl-a z f p [04:36] first killer.c: [04:36] ctx: 60196 [04:36] ctx: 60198 [04:36] ctx: 60199 [04:36] ctx: 60201 [04:36] ctx: 60202 [04:36] ctx: 60204 [04:36] ctx: 60205 [04:36] ctx: 60207 [04:36] ctx: 60208 [04:36] ctx: 60210 [04:36] ct [04:36] --- [04:36] second: [04:36] ctx: 61070 [04:36] ctx: 61071 [04:36] ctx: 60833 [04:36] ctx: 61072 [04:36] ctx: 60877 [04:36] ctx: 61075 [04:36] ctx: 61076 [04:36] ctx: 61078 [04:36] ctx: 61081 [04:36] i started the first one on the console [04:36] okay those are the last lines? [04:36] the second one via ssh [04:36] yes [04:36] hmm the console version wasn't able to hang it? [04:37] no [04:37] maybe it just needs some time? [04:38] try again, no killer on the ssh ... [04:38] ill start it on the console only [04:38] same thought :) [04:38] at least, i've found a decent way to stress my server *g* [04:41] and you 'discovered' the console too ;) [04:41] somehow, ecc gets on my nervs [04:41] i've to wait everytime the server reboots [04:41] ok [04:41] killer hung [04:41] (console) [04:41] ctx: 49211 [04:41] ctx: 49212 [04:41] ctx: 49214 [04:41] ctx: 492 [04:42] somehow, the duration until a lock occurs differs [04:42] hmm, that was quite short ... [04:42] same symtoms as usual [04:42] okay which killer version is this? if not from my page, could you upload it anywhere ... [04:43] its killer.c [04:44] from your page [04:44] are all version affected by this problem? [04:44] or only specific ones [04:45] okay sorry to bother you, but which url? [04:45] basically 1.23 and 1.3.x, x>3 should not be affected at all [04:46] i don't remember [04:46] (the url) [04:46] i will upload it [04:46] or search for a wget in my history [04:46] okay, perfect ... [04:47] one short question: how do i disable stuff like: [04:47] modprobe: Can't open dependencies file /lib/modules/2.4.24-vs1.23-2.95/modules.dep (No such file or directory) [04:47] 3c59x amd76xrom ide-scsi [04:47] the idea is to modify that killer in such way, that the code pathes are different (in the kernel) [04:47] i've got no modules [04:48] well, you obviously enabled the module interface, otherwise modprobe would not be called ... [04:48] ok [04:48] its killer-01.c [04:49] http://www.ipax.tk/~raoul/vserver [04:51] okay, give me a few minutes I add some options ... [04:54] take your time [04:54] brb [04:58] (playing some q3 ;) [04:58] hmm, you play q3a? [04:59] ra3 to be precise [04:59] you too? ;) [05:00] well, I played it some time ago ... [05:00] what nick did you use? and what mods/clans/.. did you play with [05:00] no mods no clans ... [05:01] plain q3 ... [05:01] i c [05:01] you are a clan player? [05:02] yes [05:02] but not for a living ;) [05:02] nowadays, i've got less and less time [05:02] well I never wanted to leave the 'just for fun' league ... [05:03] and of course I play it on linux ;) [05:03] well, i said to me: Don't waste your time with things of fun ;) [05:03] afternoon [05:03] heya, multijoin! [05:04] someone crashing stuff? [05:04] i see some oops in /last [05:04] bertl: i thought so ;) [05:04] (linux) [05:04] yup maja is and with a depressing efficiency ... [05:04] Bertl, one question... [05:04] hmm really? what specs? [05:04] is any php or other tool in the wild to manage vserver over webinterface? [05:05] nathan: 2.4.24-vs1.23 serial console 60 secs max ... killer-01 [05:05] Sh[a]de: yes there is ... unfortunately it's not free ... [05:06] what does oops? [05:06] mean [05:06] Bertl, gcc 2.9? [05:06] yup ... [05:06] hurmpf [05:06] smp? [05:06] yep [05:06] uhm not free... [05:06] interesting [05:06] not free and still in development or what ;) [05:06] or commercial... [05:06] not free and seems not available ... [05:07] ok thanks [05:07] np [05:08] let me see what can i do in php for this "gap" [05:08] that would be great ... I guess ... [05:08] hmm my night is long... [05:08] *g [05:08] actually if you need some ideas, just ask ... [05:09] ok, iI will do this for certain. [05:09] ,) [05:10] nathan: what does oops exactly mean? [05:10] enrico has also great ideas how to create/copy/unify vservers ... maybe a close integration would be beneficial? [05:10] k, i will ask Enrico about it. [05:12] Sh[a]de: to demonstrate new interface: today I built a vserver with 'vserver registration build -m apt-rpm --hostname registration.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de --interface 192.168.0.151/21 --flags sched,nproc --netbcast 192.168.7.255 --context 151 -- -d fc1' [05:12] should be easy to write a php (or whatever) wrapper around such cmdlines [05:12] hmmm yes thats right [05:13] but I am not a webdeveloper... [05:13] nobody is perfect ;) [05:13] little joke [05:13] *g [05:13] u do great things [05:13] just like herbert [05:14] but let me see what i can do [05:14] Action: ensc would not count webdevelopment as a subset of perfection [05:14] Action: ensc hides and runs [05:15] no not perfection but the association of this parts can be result a perfect work, i think :) [05:17] any1 who is able to translate oops for me? :) [05:17] i think the first step should contain the most necessary things. [05:17] oops? [05:17] translate? [05:17] *g [05:17] yeah [05:17] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/killer-03.c [05:17] what is the full pronounation of a kernel oop [05:17] bertl: for me? [05:17] okay, compile that one and try it with killer 1 [05:18] OOPS [05:18] Object Oriented Program Support (OOP) [05:18] OOPS [05:18] Object-Oriented Programming System (OOP) [05:18] for now i have to install a new devel. maschine for this... for this i have to go away and switch my monitor to the other maschine... see ya later [05:18] cja [05:19] i shall execute "./killer 1", right? [05:19] the 'new' killer , right ... over the console ... [05:19] ensc.. wow i didn't know this... [05:19] ok [05:19] running [05:19] Sh[a]de: oops, he did it again ... [05:19] hehe [05:20] (happily) [05:20] 05:22:02 up 33 min, 2 users, load average: 94.71, 24.99, 8.65 [05:20] 105.42, 29.52, 10.30 [05:20] hehe, that much output stresses my putty ;) [05:21] 160kb/sec [05:21] 152.72, 48.48, 17.28 [05:21] still running [05:21] i guess i should start this in a screen [05:21] yeah, imagine with the right serial card you could get up to 4Mbit ;) [05:21] and that easily ... [05:22] nathan_: could you verify my logic in killer-03.c ? [05:22] please ? [05:22] taking a look [05:22] so depending on arg uses dynamic and static ctx? [05:22] maharaja: you are getting ctx numbers? [05:23] -1 [05:23] all the time [05:23] hmm, what kernel? [05:23] 2.4.24-vs1.23-2.95 [05:23] hmm, obviously I got something wrong ... should have tried that code ... ;) [05:24] Bertl, gxid isnt going to be shared across the fork [05:24] well, then it should return 10, right? [05:25] yea i would expect it to [05:25] does he get 10 on the first hit? [05:26] i get 10 [05:26] as expected [05:26] raoul@red:~$ ./killer-03 1|head -20 [05:26] loop() [05:26] ctx: -1 [05:26] loop() [05:26] ctx: -1 [05:26] loop() [05:26] ctx: -1 [05:26] loop() [05:26] ctx: -1 [05:26] loop() [05:26] ctx: -1 [05:26] mhm, did i patch my kernel the right way?! [05:27] maharaja, chcontext --ctx 1 bash [05:27] works? [05:27] New security context is 1 [05:27] red:/home/raoul# [05:27] hmm [05:27] i see lots of killer-03 :) [05:28] raoul@red:~$ ps aux|grep killer-03|wc -l [05:28] 528 [05:28] loop() [05:28] ctx: 0 [05:28] Last message repeated 1 time(s). [05:28] loop() [05:28] ctx: 0 [05:29] Last message repeated 9 time(s). [05:29] hmm funny ... [05:29] guess I have to read the source again ;) [05:29] im getting 10 :) [05:29] damn [05:29] i should study [05:29] loop() [05:29] ctx: 10 [05:29] loop() [05:29] ctx: 10 [05:29] loop() [05:30] ctx: 10 [05:30] loop() [05:30] ctx: 10 [05:30] loop() [05:30] ctx: 10 [05:30] you started it with "killer-03 1"? [05:30] yes [05:30] anything else i get random as expected [05:30] mine is working as the code reads [05:31] ah okay, the return value isn't the context id .. thank U Jack! [05:31] not in the static case ... [05:33] strange coincedence that im getting 10? [05:33] how do i kill the killer-03 [05:33] hehe [05:33] try killall -9 killer-03 [05:33] it did not work [05:33] while :; do killall killer-03 -9;done did ;) [05:34] btw, i used gcc-3.3 [05:34] when? [05:34] since you started? [05:34] no [05:34] for killer-03 [05:34] oh thats ok [05:34] red:/home/raoul# cat /proc/version [05:34] Linux version 2.4.24-vs1.23-2.95 (root@red.ipax.tk) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)) #3 SMP Thu Jan 15 02:27:30 CET 2004 [05:34] its the kernel we worry about [05:34] user space shouldnt be able to crash kernel space no matter what code is generated by a compiler :) [05:35] hehe, well, killer-01 is able to do so *G* [05:35] nice work [05:35] yea but its not beause killer-01 was compiled with 2.9/3 in all likely cases [05:37] no [05:38] i ponder running your kernel and seeing how it does on my box [05:38] i definitely could not crash 1.23 on my box using the same method it sounds like you are using [05:39] want it? [05:39] if i give you a .config could you build me a kernel on your box and ill run it? [05:39] sure [05:39] k one sec [05:40] http://0x00.org/hidden/config.txt [05:41] is this a ck1 kernel? [05:41] (cause of the HZ setting) [05:42] yea it is, among other things [05:42] any special options in the Makefile? [05:42] i added gcc-2.95 [05:42] okay maharaja, if you finished your current task, please reload the killer-03.c it is now modified to use funnier numbers ... [05:42] nope, do it the exact way yours is other than the config [05:42] and CFLAGS_KERNEL = -g [05:43] mhm [05:43] k [05:43] then i copy my src dir [05:43] instead of tar xjf a new one [05:43] I'm interested if killer-03 1 could bring down the machine ... [05:43] no need to hurry, though ... [05:44] killer with dynamic contexts definitely did not kill my box : [05:44] :/ [05:45] well nathan_ you can try the static killer version ;) [05:45] maybe it gets the job done ... [05:45] wasnt he originally using the dynamic version to crash the box? [05:46] yes ... and I'm very curious how the static will behave ... [05:46] mhm [05:47] i run: make dep;make clean;make bzImage [05:47] blacklist.c:91: redefinition of `acpi_blacklisted' [05:47] /home/raoul/src-2.95/linux-2.4.24/include/linux/acpi.h:430: `acpi_blacklisted' previously defined here [05:47] maharaja, make mrproper, then do it [05:47] backup the .config first [05:48] ähm [05:48] rm -f procfs_example.sgml [05:48] make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/raoul/src-2.95/linux-2.4.24/Documentation/DocBook' [05:48] gcc-2.95 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/split-include scripts/split-include.c [05:48] make: *** No rule to make target `include/linux/autoconf.h', needed by `include/config/MARKER'. Stop. [05:48] make menuconfig :) [05:48] then do it [05:48] hehe [05:48] gotta link up the include dirs [05:48] :D [05:49] (copy my config back before doing the menuconfig and the rest of the build of course) [05:50] mhm [05:50] somehow i get fucked all the time [05:50] {standard input}:5954: FATAL: Can't write ide-probe.o: Illegal seek [05:50] ok [05:50] hmm [05:50] disk full [05:50] ;) [05:50] that will do it :) [05:51] ok, creating a new logical volume and moving the stuff [05:51] *counting* [05:51] theres no rush, im still testing 1.3.5 overnight so i may not be able to run this kernel on that box till tomorrow [05:51] well [05:51] i want to get to sleep soon ;) [05:51] but am curious to help y [05:51] you [05:51] test killer-03. test killer-03. test killer-03. test killer-03. [05:52] ok [05:52] then i stop the compile stuff [05:52] and test it [05:52] /sublime message end [05:52] yea do that [05:52] run the killer stuff and see if you can sort that out [05:52] still waiting for the mv to complete [05:53] done [05:53] ok [05:53] on the console? [05:53] or via ssh [05:53] console [05:53] btw: currently, i've got no vserver up and running [05:53] if that has anything to do [05:53] with anything [05:53] ;) [05:53] no, not at all [05:53] (I hope ;) [05:54] ok, i see random ctx [05:55] fine ... if it doesn't crash, chances are good that the dynamic code is broken ... [05:55] mhm, now i hit ctrl-c to put it into a screen [05:55] hmm, which I actually fixed up in 1.3.x so this should not harm 1.3.5 for example ... hmm hmmm ... [05:56] ok, i guess i should keep it running? [05:56] until - say - tomorrow [05:57] a little ... if you like ... [05:57] ok [05:58] i go brush my teeth then :D [05:58] if you get any chance, when you wakeup (and it's still running), please try the killer with 2.4.24-vs1.3.5 static and dynamic ... [05:58] static? dynamic? [05:58] well killer-03 1 == static [05:58] killer-03 0 == dynamic ... [05:58] ok [05:59] so killer-03 0 will again crash my server [05:59] am i right [05:59] well, on _vs1.3.5_ it should not ... if my guess is right, anyway thank you for your help, maja ... [06:00] have a good sleep, and hopefully cu 2morrow ... [06:05] nathan_: I just remembered that I modified the dynamic stuff in 1.2x too, but I gave up, with a tiny race window still open, because the approach taken there is basically unfixable .. well I changed the whole dynamic allocation scheme in 1.3.x so there it should be fixed ... [06:07] bertl: no problem, somehow i'm happy that i can contribute something back to the community. after taking so much out [06:07] mhm [06:07] does this thing put that much load on the server? [06:07] the killer-03 [06:07] well, thats great .. nevertheless, thank you ... [06:08] yes, that is going to put some load on linux and the machine ... [06:08] currently, i try guessing if it's still running ;) [06:08] cause i started it in a screen where i switched to another window [06:08] and there is no pring reply [06:09] -r [06:09] well, I can't tell you if it's still running ... [06:09] mhm [06:10] i guess i do a reboot and then leave the console open [06:10] and the output [06:10] ;) [06:16] nite [06:16] night [06:26] re [06:26] it crashed [06:27] mhm [06:27] or not [06:27] it responds to ping [06:27] i got logged out? [06:27] mhm [06:27] it rebooted? [06:27] ctx: 8717 [06:27] ctx: 12902 [06:27] ctx: 3289 [06:27] ctx: 8535 [06:27] . [06:27] red.ipax.tk: raoul [06:27] ok, it didtn [06:27] 06:29:21 up 15 min, 1 user, load average: 1.22, 39.37, 52.37 [06:28] any1 knows why i got logged out? [06:28] Bertl, hmm how small of a race? sounds like mah was able to reproduce it quite easily? [06:29] maharaja: no idea, so it is still running? [06:29] nathan_: yeah, that is what frightens me ... the reproduceability ... [06:30] no [06:30] okay, it stopped, but it din't crash, right? [06:30] seems so [06:30] as i got back here [06:31] i saw the lines i posted [06:31] and i was logged out [06:31] maybe it stopped because the OOM killer got rid of the logon ... accidentially ... [06:31] that could explain the logout [06:32] syslog restarted too :) [06:32] the last log entries [06:32] Jan 15 06:13:41 red kernel: Freeing unused kernel memory: 104k freed [06:32] Jan 15 06:13:41 red kernel: Adding Swap: 488248k swap-space (priority -1) [06:32] Jan 15 06:13:41 red kernel: EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.19, 19 August 2002 on md(9,0), internal journal [06:32] Jan 15 06:13:41 red kernel: kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds [06:32] Jan 15 06:13:41 red kernel: EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.19, 19 August 2002 on lvm(58,0), internal journal [06:32] Jan 15 06:13:41 red kernel: EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. [06:32] Jan 15 06:25:17 red syslogd 1.4.1#10: restart. [06:32] Jan 15 06:31:24 red kernel: SysRq : HELP : loglevel0-8 reBoot tErm kIll saK showMem showPc unRaw Sync showTasks Unmount [06:33] (i tested the sysrq help) [06:33] but the uptime shows no signs of a reboot, right? [06:34] mhm [06:34] well, i have no sign of a reboot on the console [06:34] i saw that ctx: .... stuff [06:34] so i guess that there has been no reboot [06:34] what does uptime show? [06:35] 06:35:54 up 22 min, 2 users, load average: 1.34, 11.32, 34.59 [06:35] okay, that means 22mins up and running ... no question [06:36] the load averages seem to endorse the OOM theory ... [06:37] true [06:38] bevore that, with the "broken" killer-03, the load avg was: 05:30:01 up 41 min, 2 users, load average: 217.93, 313.89, 151.26 [06:39] hmm, could also be a asymtotic behaviour of the algorithm ... maybe it 'just' dies off after some time ,.. [06:40] but that does not explain the logout, does it? [06:40] no it doesn't .. maybe the logout is something unrelated, and 'caused' the killer breakdown ... [06:40] nathan_: take a look at http://www.ipax.tk/~raoul/vserver [06:41] there are too many options, I just can't tell ... [06:41] nathan_: it is not 1:1 as i made the kernel, as i still used the debian tools [06:41] s/options/possibilities/ [06:42] maharaja, ok so the bzImage is mine? [06:42] yes [06:42] ok [06:43] thanks for compiling it [06:43] np [06:45] and i put the config and Makefile in the same directory [06:46] just in case you want to know what i did [06:47] yea i saw, thanks [06:47] nox (~nox@b109203.adsl.hansenet.de) joined #vserver. [06:48] i go for a final reboot, with another kernel of mine [06:49] hi nox! [06:49] hi folks ... so glad 2 find u [06:50] we too ;) [06:50] nice new vserver main site ... gave up seatrching a working vps chan more than 6 month ago [06:51] yeah it was a little, how should I say, inactive a few months ago ... [06:52] but it is 5am in germany now ... so i have to get a bit sleep but i surely will come back [06:52] well it's 5am in austria too ;) [06:52] Bertl: now the commu increases (: [06:52] hmmm bertl is one of the new prototypes that not need to sleep *g [06:53] yeah, just need some food and work and ... the community ;) [06:53] lucky him [06:53] :) [06:53] and our vps *g* [06:55] vps? [06:55] virt priv server [06:55] oh [06:55] hehe [06:55] doh [06:55] :D [06:56] so your search for the holy grail^H^H^H^Hvps finally ended! [06:57] Bertl: thx 4 13th flor btw !!!! [06:58] Action: Sh[a]de place's a fresh cup of coffee, free for everyone in the middle of this chan [06:58] Action: Bertl takes a nip ... bzzzt [06:59] i will run 2 more tests and go to sleep too [06:59] yes, i must agree to nox! Good work! [06:59] hmm, thanks ... [06:59] no not good, great is the right word [07:00] i think this project has future [07:00] found ya with 1-2003 lin-mag germany [07:00] well, it certainly has histroy ;) [07:00] and a lot of potential [07:00] right bertl [07:00] 4sure [07:00] hmm, linux-vserver was in lin-mag? [07:01] and is so much easier than all the acl stuff ! [07:01] or the commercial grap [07:01] the 100. !!! [07:01] Bertl: does this tell you someting? [07:01] ctx: 58570 [07:01] ctx: 56445 [07:01] . [07:01] . EMSI_REQA77E [07:01] can give u the pdf [07:01] . EMSI_REQA77E [07:01] Last message repeated 1 time(s). [07:01] i ran ./killer-03 0 [07:01] nox me too plas [07:01] pls [07:02] np [07:02] 2morrow [07:02] yea yea no stress ;) [07:02] is 16mb and upload right now used [07:02] Bertl: it was in 1-2003, but back then it sounded to chatic for me ;) [07:03] ok i upload it to our server for the community [07:03] hehe [07:03] fine [07:03] i too have it ;) [07:03] yeah, another piece of history ... [07:03] Bertl: so what does the above tell you? [07:03] :) [07:03] found at donkey so shouldn?t be a prob [07:03] i thought that the server might have crashed [07:04] and pressed ctrl+c a couple of times [07:04] and tried to hit some sysrq stuff [07:04] right now, i restarted ./killer-03 0 [07:04] maharaja: Ok i search for it in donkey [07:04] as i said [07:04] ive got it online [07:05] maharaja: hmm this is with the 1.23 and killer-03 0, right? [07:05] i just have to have enough cpu power to log in ;) [07:05] yes [07:05] oh sry not maharaja i mean nox ;) [07:05] and now, i did not use that damn debian tools [07:05] for the kernel [07:05] ok [07:05] it hangs [07:05] i will press nothing [07:05] ;-) [07:05] ctx: 55942 [07:05] ctx: 55979 [07:05] ctx: 56025 [07:05] ctx: 55944 [07:05] ctx: 55981 [07:05] ctx: 55983 [07:05] what do you want me to do? [07:06] try CTRL-(a) z f p [07:06] i get [07:06] ctx: 55983 [07:06] SysRq : [07:06] p [07:06] nothing [07:07] no ping reply [07:07] hmm, interesting ... try again ... [07:08] reboot and retry? [07:08] well, try to use the killer-03 1 [07:08] Sh[a]de: ok, i deleted it *g* [07:08] ok [07:09] maharaja: np, i have found it in emule ;) [07:09] Shade: i've got a hard copy [07:09] vale (: [07:09] vale? [07:09] ok [07:09] (: [07:09] what does vale mean? [07:10] or vale == ok? [07:10] spanish for ok [07:10] :) [07:10] "killer-03 1" is running [07:10] sorry [07:10] np [07:10] english allready hard enough 4 me [07:10] its always good to learn someting new [07:10] how do you pronounce it? [07:11] as spelt [07:11] long é? [07:11] si! [07:11] right, that is the moment, where I could (once again) get some attention for my favorite bash script ... [07:11] --> :(){ :|:&};:; <--- [07:11] hehe [07:12] the kids just love it ;) [07:12] löl [07:12] did you receive a price for it? :) [07:12] nope, it's not even mine ... [07:12] go hide in some corner *g* [07:12] i thought it was your work [07:13] well, I don't see a copyright, do you? [07:13] emotion are important don?t hide ?em *lol* [07:13] +s [07:13] never saw a copyright for a oneliner [07:13] ok [07:13] ctx hangs [07:13] äh [07:13] killer-03 1 [07:13] pressing that magic stufff [07:14] nothing gets back [07:14] no ping reply [07:14] ctx: 19159 [07:14] ctx: 7264 [07:14] ctx: 32609 [07:14] okay, that is actually better than no hang ... [07:14] thats it [07:14] got any idea? [07:15] well, thats a yes/no answer [07:15] don't mind ;) [07:15] ill get to sleep then [07:16] yeah, guess I'll medidate about that a little ... [07:16] hihi [07:16] ok [07:16] have a good night .. and cu 2morrow [07:16] one last thing [07:16] i gonna go 2 cu [07:16] is it possible that the ext2fs.h has something to do with that? [07:16] because that thing was fixed by me [07:17] nope, don't worry, kernel doesn't look at glibc headers ... [07:17] Nick change: nox -> nox|na [07:17] ok [07:17] cu all [07:17] night everyone ... [07:17] hasta pronto ! [07:18] *smile* [07:18] Nick change: Bertl -> Bertl_zZ [07:18] (nox: you too!) [07:19] hmm, shouldn't that be ¡hasta pronto! ?! [07:20] hihi got me [07:20] ñññññ [07:20] señor [07:21] bueanas noches todos [07:21] -a [07:22] gn8 all [07:22] i have to work a little bit longer :) [07:22] you do a great job !!!(: [07:23] me? [07:23] don?t do we all do our best *g* [07:24] this is it what I wanted to hear :) [07:24] go on *lol* [07:24] we all do our best for this great community [07:25] first impression is first class [07:25] will do me best [07:26] not only the first impressions ;) [07:26] my first steps uhm... bad bad [07:26] right now just have that [07:26] and come back [07:26] but now... i learn an see what power is in it [07:27] i have try other commercial tools... but ... let me say... no comment *g [07:27] kestrel (athomas@dialup51.optus.net.au) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds [07:27] one is slow... one is only for experts... etc etc [07:28] I first had my vserver than a look on the rentet ones from friends ..... [07:28] the concept is 2 cool [07:28] and the biggest point of it... all costs a lot of money... and u spend money for a software that is buggy and the support are "perfect" like here [07:29] +isn't [07:29] proprietary !! [07:29] *g [07:29] yea the concept is cool [07:29] but not only the concept [07:30] a tool 4 every prob [07:30] the devel. and all other peoples who spend time for this project are really "cool" [07:30] right [07:30] looking forward [07:30] now we have in our company 4 server on one big maschine without any problems [07:30] this pushes the costs. [07:31] loved it from first day nearly exactly a year ago [07:31] and our it freaks happy to have another hobby *G [07:31] :) [07:31] of course not to the joy of her wives.... [07:32] but it is it [07:32] *g [07:32] btw is their any resolution for vunify on deb ? [07:32] Sh[a]de: *g* [07:33] hmm i think i'm not the right person to ask this *g [07:33] my roots are the web design ;) [07:33] and web devel. [07:33] and not best time 4 me right now [07:33] hehehe [07:33] nox|na: not yet; perhaps at the end of the month... [07:34] thanks ensc [07:34] ensc: thx .... but deb is small anyway [07:35] so wasn?t a big trouble [07:35] but it's not debian or rh or slackware specific. It unifies generic directories; excludelists can be filled with data from pacakgemanagemnt [07:35] ic [07:36] while googling about this often found the comment that it shouldn?t be a prob [07:36] and these are the sentences why i think my expirience with this project is still on the begining [07:37] you allway can get deeper [07:37] much deeper [07:38] so much more fascinating 2 learn [07:39] but programming other then web code... i don't do this any more. [07:39] c or c++ is too much for me to learn [07:39] Unfortunately :/ [07:40] bin admin brauch perl [07:40] oh in german ;) [07:40] nice [07:41] well, i think problems exist everywhere... [07:41] sorry german [07:41] np im a german [07:42] i understand u *g [07:42] and a little little bit espanià [07:42] ,) [07:42] yeah ... koeln ? [07:42] no [07:42] munich [07:42] ic [07:42] gretinx from hh [07:42] one of these who drink beer *g [07:43] ;) [07:43] thought cablesurf is koeln only ? [07:43] was wrong [07:43] hmm no i think cablesurf is only in munich or berlin [07:44] baden würtenberg has ISH [07:44] -or +and [07:44] 4sure i scrabble something ... soo many providers [07:44] he he np [07:44] but less with cable ... [07:45] yea yea but the only real good thing in bavarian is cable and the beer *g [07:45] what is your upload ? [07:46] i have about 1.5mbit/s down and around 300kbits up [07:46] nice [07:46] like 190kbyte down and 25kbyte up [07:46] yes it's nice [07:47] the best thing, i think, is that u don't need any password or dial in [07:47] just plug in ur modem and go on [07:47] auth over MAC Adress [07:47] hansenet is 2000/192 and u can double this .... [07:47] yea i know [07:47] it's "the fastest internet access in germany" [07:47] with 4mbit/s [07:47] but i want 2000/1000 but noway ): [07:48] hmm at cablesurf you can get around 2mbit/s upload [07:48] commercial (: [07:48] syncron [07:48] that meen up and down [07:48] commercial hanse 144mb sync [07:48] eigenes netz in hh [07:49] nice [07:49] own net in hh [07:49] *g* [07:49] cablesurf get over GlobalAccess Network [07:49] 8mb sync flat ! [07:49] it's ok with only 4 downtimes in 2 years [07:50] hehehe [07:50] thats the future [07:50] in germany cisco have a plan to bring 5 mbit/s in every house [07:50] in 2005 [07:50] hanse has it but ip are incredible expensive [07:51] 1km away there is a 10mb proj since more than a year 4 priv. [07:51] *sigh* [07:52] i think hanse must enlarge its capacities if carries on that way. [07:52] 10mbit/s? [07:52] they do ! [07:52] wow thats read great [07:52] backbonecap is availible !!! [07:52] endless [07:53] nice [07:53] knoppix is 45min *g* [07:53] well, at this time we have 100mbit/s in our datacenter... and i hope these will be a long time [07:53] with 2mb [07:54] nice [07:54] u have 2mbit/s? [07:54] downstream? [07:54] yeah [07:54] cool :) [07:55] around 260kbyte/s right? [07:55] exakt 250 [07:55] 2000/8 [07:55] nice nice [07:55] yea i know but im to rot to calculate this now [07:56] np [07:56] my eyes getting closer and closer [07:56] same [07:56] but my work don't whait *g [07:56] poor boy [07:57] she call after me... [07:57] good luck ! [07:57] no not poor ;) [07:57] thanks [07:58] in german there is a nice sentence for this [07:58] working when your a tired is poor imho [07:58] Wenn du Selbständig bist, dann arbeitest du selbst und das ständig ;) [07:58] ic Sh[a]de (: [07:59] thats the way i have to go... [07:59] so it is at least 4 yourself [07:59] right [07:59] i told u ... [07:59] u do a great job [07:59] (: [07:59] and for people i know that my work isn't wasted [08:00] thanks but i think u too :) [08:00] good feeling so important [08:00] we all do a great job [08:00] hihi [08:00] yea but good feelings are not all [08:00] u must work for it [08:00] u do ! [08:00] someday harder someday lower... [08:01] :) [08:01] but all is harder when time is wasted [08:01] ok but time is only wasted when u you want that it is so [08:02] that is only right if you manage to b free ! imho [08:02] in past i have wasted too much time... [08:02] but this is another book of my life ;) [08:03] *sigh* (::) [08:03] women women women *g [08:03] not more to say i think [08:04] *.* [08:04] ahh these are feelings... right devel maschine with vs1.23 and left a devel. maschine with vs1.35 [08:04] (: [08:04] an in the middle my windoof maschine to chat and work [08:05] +d [08:05] winstupid (: [08:05] 2 stupid 2 win +lol* [08:06] windows but also only because I don't like KDE or other gfx interfaces for linux. [08:06] löl right [08:06] if the world is without walls and fences __ who needs windows and gates ??? [08:06] lol right [08:06] but right now... who need gates ;) [08:07] today i have a phone interview with microsoft washington [08:07] no sry that was a bad english [08:07] irc doesn?t need any graphics *g* [08:07] yesterday ;) i had it [08:08] install irssi on a vserver and format c: [08:08] thats right but dreamweaver, photoshop and other things are only for windoof [08:08] ok forgiven *lol* [08:08] thanks very much *g [08:09] pixelschubser need win ic *fg* [08:09] and my mac is only here too see it and love it *g -joke- [08:09] *smile* [08:09] löl pixelschubser [08:10] really funny name [08:10] but it's the truth [08:10] *g [08:10] Action: nox|na is angry that his handy doesn?t run open source [08:10] uhm [08:10] did u hear about symbian os? [08:10] isn't it os? [08:11] i think it was symbian [08:11] os is so much (: [08:11] symbian ... no ... is a brunch of what ? [08:11] yes and thats very ok [08:11] i don't know i have a Sony Ericsson T68i *g [08:12] and don't know what os running on that [08:12] no osos [08:12] hihi [08:12] the only thing i know is: it's lame damm slow [08:13] openbsd ??? *jk* [08:13] but i love it to go online in ICE oder IC when i rail to Frankfurt am Main [08:13] no i think not openbsd *g [08:14] *gape* [08:15] hmmm thats funny... the error "grep: /VM1/etc/inittab: No such file or directory [08:15] is disappeared [08:15] but why... [08:15] hmmm [08:16] hmmm [08:16] every time i start a v i have this error msg [08:16] imho vps doesn?t need inittab [08:16] but at this time the error is disappeared [08:16] hmm mystic things at 6 o'clock *g [08:17] yea i know [08:17] 2 hard [08:17] 2 strong [08:17] 2 late for it *g [08:17] 2morrow *lol* [08:17] hmm we have 2morrow *g [08:17] or u mean next day? [08:17] f...k [08:18] (: [08:18] yea yea time is going away... [08:18] but! [08:18] not wasted ,) [08:18] *drueck* [08:18] rofl in our other irc network we have some bots [08:19] we 2 [08:19] every day i can laughting out loud with Sentences how [08:19] [6:09am]«+ DrKloete » städtische Müllwirtschaft Nordwest, mein Name ist Kloete, womit kann ich Ihnen helfen? [08:19] rofl [08:19] 11 of 14 to 18 are bots [08:19] completely meaning free but funny [08:20] löl [08:20] like a bot channel [08:20] don?t ask me not my playground [08:20] :) [08:20] i just have an ircd in an vps [08:21] uva [08:21] hmmm why the directory initrd is exist now... hmmm [08:21] initrd... inittab ??? [08:22] hmm [08:22] yes and no [08:22] init.rd u need [08:22] the dir initrd wasn't exist [08:22] in / [08:22] ups [08:22] 2late [08:22] *confuseTHEcat* [08:22] *g [08:23] well, this is the right time for concentration [08:23] ask some guys here from ny or australia *g* [08:23] no women, no kids and no neighbors these irritate :) [08:24] hmm i only ask bertl or ensc *g [08:24] -joke- [08:26] Action: Sh[a]de drinks the 5. cup of coffee [08:26] Action: nox|na needs breakfast ... [08:26] hmm good idea [08:27] but the baker opens at 7:00 [08:27] *toasteranheiz* [08:28] :/ [08:28] 30min [08:28] yes [08:28] 30min [08:28] drink coffee with much sugar ... that always take me hunger [08:28] (: [08:29] hmmm these is one way *g [08:29] this [08:30] works 2 good 4 me [08:30] i have to stop at the 5. cup [08:31] a day a n hour ? [08:31] not more caffeine [08:32] i am robust in that point [08:32] me too but i should sleep more :) [08:32] yeah is the better opinion if u have it [08:33] u say it "if u have it" [08:37] ): [08:38] but it's np [08:38] weekend is coming [08:39] ^^ [08:40] The UNIX Guru´s view of Sex: [08:40] unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; umount; sleep [08:40] *g [08:43] *lol* [08:43] have 2 remeber this [08:43] hmmm not really i think [08:43] *g [08:44] wortwitz [08:44] :) [08:44] not pratice [08:44] hihi [08:44] well... who knows *fg [08:47] ohoh we heavily spamt the other?s logs *g* [08:48] uhm u right [09:07] Simon (~sgarner@apollo.quattro.net.nz) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds [09:12] Simon (~sgarner@apollo.quattro.net.nz) joined #vserver. [09:22] Shade (shade@cpe109.bb101.cablesurf.de) joined #vserver. [09:23] Nick change: Shade -> Shad[e] [09:24] Shad[e] (shade@cpe109.bb101.cablesurf.de) left irc: Client Quit [09:30] Sh[a]de (shade@cpe109.bb101.cablesurf.de) left irc: Ping timeout: 480 seconds [09:30] Shade (shade@cpe109.bb101.cablesurf.de) joined #vserver. [09:31] Nick change: Shade -> Sh[a]de [11:26] kestrel (athomas@dialup51.optus.net.au) joined #vserver. [11:47] mcp (~hightower@wolk-project.de) joined #vserver. [13:07] Simon (~sgarner@apollo.quattro.net.nz) left irc: Quit: so long, and thanks for all the fish [13:51] serving (~serving@213.186.189.105) left irc: Read error: Connection reset by peer [13:59] deadguy (deadguy@bananajoe.big.du.se) left irc: Ping timeout: 492 seconds [14:36] deadguy (deadguy@bananajoe.big.du.se) joined #vserver. [14:44] deadguy (deadguy@bananajoe.big.du.se) left irc: Ping timeout: 492 seconds [15:48] serving (~serving@213.186.189.105) joined #vserver. [16:42] deadguy (deadguy@bananajoe.big.du.se) joined #vserver. [17:35] Nick change: nox|na -> nox [18:58] mhepp (~mhepp@r72s22p13.home.nbox.cz) joined #vserver. [19:05] serving (~serving@213.186.189.105) left irc: Ping timeout: 492 seconds [19:18] re folks [19:18] i have finished edit the Linux Mag. document [19:19] u can download it at: http://www.wwip.de/vserver/Linux.Magazin.VServer.01-2003.pdf [19:19] happy read ;) [19:21] serving (~serving@213.186.190.24) joined #vserver. [19:26] thx Sh[a]de .... with that it all began , but makes sense only for germans *g* [19:31] jo i have this link posted in the mailinglist too but with a [Germany] notice ;) [19:31] right now we have problems with vs1.23 [19:31] and kernel 2.4.24 [19:32] al works great... the server falls away however as soon as a VServer is started.... [19:32] no keyboard, no mouse nothing all hangs [19:32] only a hard reset can bringt him back to "life" [19:33] the logfiles are empty :( [19:33] at this the the server hangs... [19:33] had there also stab probs ... thinc acpi on bx board was no good idea *g* [19:33] no bx board [19:33] but urs ? [19:33] it's a 2ghz cerleron [19:33] in datacenter [19:34] currently a file check is running on 15 parts :/ [19:34] take a while.. [19:34] you have same kernelconf like before (and that worked) [19:34] the test what i will be do now is to use the "old" kernel 2.4.23 with 1.22 [19:34] and we will see... [19:35] tried 2.6 allready ? [19:35] no [19:35] not stable [19:36] this server are a production maschine :/ [19:36] not devel. [19:36] u said u also test the dev version so i thought maybe that 2 [19:37] when stable 2.6 will bring so much better perf , special on highload [19:39] i hope :) [19:39] but i think it will be so [19:54] one question [19:54] exists logs about vserver activities? [19:54] if yes, where can is find it? [19:54] -s [19:57] is part of the kern so klogd should be responsible [19:57] = norm syslog [19:57] fac kern [19:57] facility [20:00] nope [20:00] all logs are breaks at the time the server hangs [20:01] if kernelpanic .... always [20:01] hmmm thats the mystic [20:01] it's no kernel panic [20:01] but the server's hardware are ok [20:01] and healthy [20:02] hm [20:02] now i have re-linked the "old" kernel [20:02] 2.4.23 with vs1.22 [20:28] re [20:28] re [20:32] thnx for the pdf [20:32] np [20:33] mhm, you do ip transit? interesting [20:33] yes it's one of many parts [20:34] do you really have an own infrastructure, and are using several uplink providers, or did you rent lots of space, and simply route via one provider? [20:35] 'cause whats netdirect :) [20:36] well, the ripe ip entrys not currently not set [20:36] -not [20:36] we are in interxion datacenter with own infra. [20:36] in partnership with 1stbna gmbh [20:37] i c [20:37] it's a long way to set all perfect [20:38] and since today around 04:00 o'clock we have problems with a vserver host :/ [20:38] http://www.netlantis.org/index.php?menu=11&page=gasp&query=217.20.113.170 [20:38] this costs me the last nerve... [20:39] nice overview :) [20:39] yeah, gasp is nice [20:40] hmm did u read the mailinglist? [20:41] what does this meen: but if you can do some forum <-> mail mapping, that would be great! [20:41] ? [20:41] mail gateway to a web forum/bb? [20:41] hmm [20:44] my idea :) [20:44] mrbawb: very nice thing, that netlantis [20:44] maharaja: yup [20:45] allthough i do not know, what everything means [20:45] are the branches all uplinks from that ip/provider? [20:45] uplink isn't exactly the right word [20:45] ie, 217.20.113.170 has two uplinks [20:46] whats the right one? [20:46] connection [20:46] like [router]<------- cable ------>[router] [20:46] uplink implies a hierarchy that might or might not exist [20:47] sometimes it's one cable, sometimes its many. sometimes its two routers, sometimes its many [20:47] yeah, but basically [20:47] netlantis only has a summerization of that data [20:47] so peering would be the right word? [20:47] Nick change: Bertl_zZ -> Bertl [20:47] morning everyone! [20:47] hiho [20:47] peering is kind of tricky, because it can mean different things to different people [20:48] Bertl: morning! :) [20:48] hey bert [20:48] im trying maharjas kernel [20:48] maha, what killer did you crash it with? [20:49] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/killer-01.c? [20:49] actually i just crashed it [20:49] well, i do not know the official definition of a peering, but a peering to me is some kind of agreement (and the infrastructure) to directly exchange data between two individuals/companies/providers [20:49] nathan: ./killer-01 [20:49] and [20:49] ./killer-03 (0|1) [20:50] so every killer :D [20:50] yea i just killed it with a dynamic killer [20:50] so its not just your machine [20:50] nathan_: well good, this means that it is reproducible ... [20:50] questions remaining: [20:50] nathan: so can you compile me a kernel with my config? :) [20:50] a) will 1.3.5 crash on maharaja's machine with the same config? [20:50] maharaja, its only fair :) [20:51] maharaja, where is your config? [20:51] mhm, i have to up it [20:51] b) is nathan able to crash maharaja's kernel with the stable killer? [20:51] but the server is currently not running [20:51] and honestly, i've got a limited amount of time today [20:51] Bertl, b is what i just did [20:51] got an exam tomorrow at 800 [20:51] maharaja, sure thats fine, whenever you have time. [20:52] c) is a kernel, compiled at nathan's crashable for maharaja? [20:52] thats what we will try when he has more time [20:52] nathan_: killer-01 1 crashes it? [20:53] root@plain [~]# ./killer [20:53] loop() [20:53] Last message repeated 3 time(s). [20:53] root@plain [~]# [20:53] root@plain [~]# w [20:53] 12:50:15 up 7 min, 1 user, load average: 31.88, 7.47, 2.49 [20:53] USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT [20:53] root pts/1 209-6-130-26:S.0 12:49pm 0.00s 18.19s 0.02s w [20:53] root@plain [~]# w [20:53] forget it killer-03 I mean [20:53] 12:50:15 up 7 min, 1 user, load average: 31.88, 7.47, 2.49 [20:53] USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT [20:53] root pts/1 209-6-130-26:S.0 12:49pm 0.00s 18.43s 0.03s w [20:53] root@plain [~]# wget http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/killer-01.c [20:53] --12:50:39-- http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/killer-01.c [20:53] => `killer-01.c' [20:53] Resolving vserver.13thfloor.at... done. [20:53] Connecting to vserver.13thfloor.at[209.135.140.107]:80... connected. [20:53] HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK [20:53] Length: 1,741 [text/plain] [20:53] 100%[==============================================================================================================================>] 1,741 1.66M/s ETA 00:00 [20:53] 12:50:39 (1.66 MB/s) - `killer-01.c' saved [1741/1741] [20:53] root@plain [~]# make killer-01 [20:53] cc killer-01.c -o killer-01 [20:53] so killer-03 1 crashes it? [20:53] died just as cc was running it [20:53] Bertl, it doed with nathan killer which is just the same killer (dynamic ctx) with ip4vroot [20:54] yeah fine, but what about killer-03 1 (the static tests only) [20:54] cant do that till the box comes back up [20:55] well no problem, but that is the interesting part, because if this doesn't crash, it's in the dynamic context part, if it does, it isn't in the context path (or not very likely) but somewhere else ... [20:56] same goes for the question if a kernel compiled at your site, with gcc 2.95 and his config, can be crashed or not?! [21:02] hmmm bertl [21:03] do you know about a error that freezes the complete server with 2.4.24 and vs1.23? [21:03] well, yes, the one we are searching atm. for example ;) [21:03] oh *g ok [21:04] me was away to bring up the server ;) i haven't read this up there [21:04] with 2.4.23 and vs1.22 it seems to be ok [21:04] np, how did your server freeze? if it did? [21:05] hmm well thats the question... [21:05] all logfile entrys where nice... [21:05] at the moment the server hangs the syslog stand too [21:05] but it's not a hardware problem or a healthy prob [21:05] I mean, could you describe what happened and what you did to get it back? [21:05] yea i have always 2 kernels [21:06] just try to describe your issues ... [21:06] i have unlinked the "buggy" and linked the old one [21:06] hard restartet over kvm and all work nice [21:06] okay, you use remote syslog? [21:06] not at this server [21:06] so how could you tell syslog stopped? [21:07] one second [21:07] because nothing was in the syslog after? [21:07] the syslog stops at a cron or other jobs [21:08] and begin with the normal msg about booting [21:08] no error or something [21:08] okay, and you do not have a console attached to this server, so you won't see a panic or something like that, right? [21:09] no bertl thats the mystic... [21:09] the server "only" hangs [21:09] no panic nothing [21:09] do you use panic= on the kernel command line? [21:09] no [21:10] Sh[a]de (shade@cpe109.bb101.cablesurf.de) left irc: Read error: No route to host [21:10] Shade (shade@cpe109.bb101.cablesurf.de) joined #vserver. [21:10] hmm, how do you know that it wasn't a panic? [21:11] sry disconnect [21:11] the noc in our datacenter restarted and do some inspect [21:11] he told me the server hangs [21:11] without any msg [21:11] no keyboard no mouse nothing [21:11] only a hard reset will bring him back [21:11] okay, ... looks like the issue we are investigating atm [21:11] Nick change: Shade -> Sh[a]de [21:12] yes i think to because the kernel 2.4.23 with vs.1.22 works without problems [21:12] server and 2 v-childs on and running [21:12] the interesting part is, that you managed to hit it under 'normal' conditions ... [21:13] and I do not want to worry you, but this issue is in _all_ vserver versions, and we hoped that it was fixed in v1.23 ... [21:13] hmm my first think was a "spezial" application of our customers... [21:13] but no exotic app running [21:13] just a few questions, to make sure: [21:13] ok [21:14] a) you are using SMP machines? [21:14] no [21:14] b) hyper threading P4? [21:14] yes [21:14] c) the machine it happened on was a P4 HT which sees two cpus? [21:15] no it was a default celeron 2ghz with 512mb ddr ram [21:15] the "smallest" host for v we have [21:15] okay, that is interesting, because it doesn't fit our pattern ... [21:15] :/ sounds not really good [21:16] could you schedule a test on that machine for let's say 10-20 minutes [21:16] ? [21:17] yes thats np because all customers now stored on other v hosts [21:17] but (!) [21:17] if the server crashes again we have to whait some time for a kvm [21:17] about 30 or 45minutes [21:18] im wondering that the error isn't here at my devel. server... [21:19] Linux wwipvmdev-01 2.4.24-vs1.23 #1 SMP Thu Jan 15 05:07:44 CET 2004 i686 unknown <- devel. server with exactly the same config [21:20] without the SMP ;) [21:21] okay, in that case I would really like you to run a test on that machine ... [21:21] where we are running tests is identical but you right... lets test it on the devel. [21:22] we have compiles of the same kernel 2.4.24-vs1.23 compiled with a similar compiler 2.95/2.96 .. one kernel crashes within a few seconds with the killer app .. the other withstans for several hours ... [21:22] JonB (~NoSuchUse@129.142.112.33.ip.tele2adsl.dk) joined #vserver. [21:23] hmm exist these 2 kernels ? [21:23] or we have to compile it? [21:23] sec let me see what compiler installed right now [21:24] those kernels are available, but they won't help you much, as they are system specific ;) [21:24] k np [21:24] currently its gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) [21:24] and on the remote server... one sec [21:24] but if your machine did hang, it would be interesting to run the killer test on exactly this machine with exactly the kernel which hung ... [21:25] uhm [21:25] it's the same compiler version [21:25] gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) [21:25] remote and devel. [21:26] as I said ... we are not sure where too look atm ... [21:26] s/too/to/ [21:26] bertl np [21:26] let me know how i can help and i help ;) [21:26] and it isn't very encouraging to read on lkml that 2.4.24 seems to lock up under certain conditions too ... [21:26] im not a c/c++ programmer but maybe a little help [21:27] perfect, okay, let me see if I got you right: [21:27] click (click@gonnamakeyou.com) left irc: Quit: AIEEEE! Terminal lost. System reboot in progress. [21:27] thats right bertl [21:27] there is a machine, UP celeron, which hung with 2.4.24-vs1.23 [21:27] right, but only hangs when any v-child is started [21:28] this machine does not host customer vserver and would be up again in about 30-40 mins if we crash it ... [21:28] right now no customers on it.... [21:28] no harm done to you or anybody else, right? [21:28] right [21:28] okay in that case, please download the following killer apps: [21:29] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/killer-01.c [21:29] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/killer-03.c [21:29] ok sec [21:29] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/killer-nathan-02.c [21:30] loaded [21:30] should i try now the other kernel? [21:31] the vs.1.23 one... [21:31] uhm [21:31] bertl thats interesting [21:31] u know "mrtg"? [21:32] yup [21:32] on my devel. maschine i started mrtg for testing... [21:32] and my terminal hangs [21:32] the same as the remote one [21:32] O_o [21:32] hmm, terminal or machine? [21:32] one mom [21:33] Bertl: I was wondering, is any company paying to spend this much time on vserver? You're doing an amazing job! [21:33] maschine... [21:33] GPL'd code and making money... ? those two phrases go together!? [21:33] wth [21:33] kungfuftr: why not? [21:34] hmm bertl [21:34] kungfuftr: you've never heard of redhat, suse, etc? [21:34] u know a bug with snmpd? [21:34] Zoiah: cos most opensource companies have gone bust or had to decrease size significantly [21:34] kungfuftr: this happens in non-OS world also. [21:34] kungfuftr: worldcom, enron, etc. :) [21:34] Sh[a]de: well I know many bugs with snmpd, but it should not be able to take down a machine ... [21:35] Zoiah: redhat have shrunk, suse had to lay off a lot of staff and re-organise their business structure, oh yeah... and ever heard of VA Linux? [21:35] no sry my misspeling [21:35] a bug with snmpd AND vserver [21:35] i think it's why my maschine stops [21:35] ... [21:35] hmm, interesting ... [21:35] Zoiah: industrial fraud, and going bust are 2 different things [21:35] Sh[a]de: please elaborate/describe [21:35] let me test something [21:36] one sec [21:36] kungfuftr: fraud generally happens when there isn't enough money to do it 'proper' anymore. [21:36] kungfuftr: anyhow, this is totally not relevant to my question. [21:37] =0) [21:37] ok now i confused [21:37] listen [21:37] kungfuftr: there are many companies where employees are paid to work on opensource. [21:37] Zoiah: yes... i am one of those [21:37] kungfuftr: so I was wondering if this was the same case with Bertl. :) [21:37] one maschine has mrtg with 2.4.24 and 1.23 running without problems [21:37] the kernel of this maschine has no APM or ACPI enabled by the kernel [21:38] the other one has it and crash with mrtg [21:38] hmm, ACPI can easily 'hang' a machine with a broken (read older) kernel ... [21:39] and it often does on laptops too ... [21:39] but... wth has mrtg with acpi or apm working? [21:39] ok this can be but... all kernel the newest :/ [21:40] ok bertl i download now the killer to my devel. [21:40] okay, the devel was the one that crashed? [21:40] please give me some support [21:40] right [21:41] okay, you download it and compile it with [21:41] maybe the debian gcc messes something up? (did not read the last discussions) [21:41] Sh[a]de: gcc -o killer-03 killer-03.c [21:42] done [21:42] then you start it on the host with ./killer-03 [21:42] it should start printing out numbers ... [21:42] nathan_: which distribution do you use? [21:42] running [21:42] wow running fast *g [21:42] because shade and me are using debian's gcc [21:43] ctx: 53004 [21:43] hang [21:43] terminal is death [21:43] does anyone know of a util to ask a ip for its CIFS name ? [21:43] no ping response [21:44] mashine is crashed [21:45] need output from monitor? [21:45] because the maschine isn't connected right now to my tft [21:46] but connecting is np [21:46] some fitness ^^ brb [21:47] back [21:47] hmmm [21:48] seems to be all right [21:48] login promt and no error msg [21:48] but no network... [21:48] hmm interesting ... [21:48] for u sure ;) [21:48] im confused *g [21:48] well, the killer stresses the linux kernel very much ... [21:49] hmmm [21:49] ok let me test if i can login local [21:49] sec [21:49] it could easily be that everything else is very slow ... [21:50] hmmm bertl [21:50] i see the login promt but i can't type anything [21:50] thats really interesting [21:50] ok what next? [21:51] should i restart die mschine? [21:51] +a [21:51] the server with kernel 2.4.23 and vs.1.22 still running [21:51] okay, so the machine seems dead? [21:51] yes it's death [21:52] okay, does console switching or numlock still work? [21:52] nope [21:52] nothing [21:52] hmm, interesting indeed ... [21:52] like the remote server [21:52] okay this machine isn't SMP/HT right? [21:52] right [21:53] a simple/single UP celeron ... [21:53] it's the same but only little slower then the maschine in datacenter [21:53] right [21:53] and which killer did take it down? [21:53] 03 [21:53] with option 1 or 0 [21:53] or none at all? [21:53] ./killer-03 [21:53] that was your command [21:53] okay, perfect, just checking ... [21:54] kk [21:54] im still here ;) [21:54] and the same machine with vs1.22 stays up? [21:54] right [21:54] could you verify that on the machine which crashed? [21:54] but i not stressed this maschine [21:55] hmm what verify? [21:55] that it goes down/hangs with vs1.22 and killer-03 ? [21:55] ok i can test it [21:55] give me some minutes [21:56] or doesn't hang ... in the case we expect ... [22:05] I have asked because on one machine (with heavy load) i have problems [22:05] with 2.4.23 and 2.4.24-pre* - crashes without any information (no oops) [22:05] in logs file or console (connected via RS). Only blank screen. Sync or [22:05] umount via SysRq doesn't work, only (re)boot. System is RH 9, ext3 [22:05] 2x2.66GHz (with HT), aic79xx, 4GB RAM +4GB swap. [22:05] (excerpt from lkml) [22:07] hmm but this is a dual server... right?! [22:07] yes, we only encountered it on dual servers too until now ... [22:08] ok we will see... i need some minutes... [22:08] np [22:09] to prepare the 2 kernels [22:09] huh? which ones? [22:09] no no i have prepared the kernels and now i search the right one ;) [22:09] don't panic bertl [22:10] one with 1.23 and one with 1.22 [22:10] all 2.4.24er [22:10] hmm, okay but you 'saved' the one which did hang on you, right? [22:10] right [22:11] good, most people accidentially destroy the evidence on testing ... that's why I get nervous sometimes ... [22:11] no i save every kernel [22:11] with date and some infos ;) [22:12] it's more work but for me it's better to overlook this things [22:12] it seems that ext3 + 2.4.23/24 leads to issues ... (once again *sigh*) [22:14] mhm [22:14] ive got ext3 [22:17] hmm well that wasn't directly on topic, because those hangs should not be related to the ext3 issues ... [22:18] click (click@gonnamakeyou.com) joined #vserver. [22:18] another lkml report: [22:18] We've had about 6 cases of this now, across 4 separate boxes. Since [22:18] upgrading to 2.4.24, our SMP web server boxes (both Intel and AMD [22:18] hardware) are randomly blowing up. This may have happened on 2.4.23 as [22:18] well, but they weren't really running long enough to tell. 2.4.22 was [22:18] fine. GCC 3.3.3. [22:19] First one was locking up few times per day (pretty big load), second one maybe [22:19] once per day/two (lower load). [22:21] dont say we're bumping to 2.4.25 soon? [22:21] *sigh* [22:21] well, good thing is that it's for SMP-systems [22:21] well, it is not known why 2.4.23/24 hangs, so it isn't fixed yet ... [22:21] bad thing is that I've got a few :/ [22:22] and regarding SMP/UP, Sh[a]de is currently crashing his celeron UP very successfully :( [22:22] <- do some customer support [22:22] brbr [22:22] ooops [22:22] unfortunately no oops 8-) [22:22] bertl: is it worth to consider the gcc build from debian? [22:22] maharaja: gcc on stable deb i working ok [22:23] s/i/is [22:23] at least it seems so :/ [22:23] I'm thinking about backporting the stuff to 2.4.22 or 21 just to see if it crashes there ... [22:23] click: shade and me run the gcc 2.95 from debian [22:23] and we both crash [22:23] i don't know what nathan_ runs though [22:23] hm. [22:24] i sent a kernel i build on my system to nathan_, and he crashed too [22:24] but with his build, there are no crashes [22:24] with his build on yours then? [22:25] not tested yet [22:25] i've got to study :-/ [22:25] lemme check [22:25] (should be studing right now) [22:25] Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs [22:25] gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) [22:25] but i've got a gentoo box :) [22:25] and it works here [22:25] mhm, i run testing [22:26] maharaja: you are studying, but on the wrong topic ;) [22:26] click@storm:~$ uname -r [22:26] 2.4.23-vs1.20-grsec1.9.13-1 [22:26] thats my lappie. [22:26] bertl: true :) [22:26] bertl: it should be "quality managment" instead of "kernel compilation and linux interna" [22:27] 20:28:11 up 9 days, 20:31, 4 users, load average: 1.10, 0.95, 0.93 [22:27] hmm, well that is closely related, atm, isn't it? [22:27] huhum, 9 days uptime on a laptop. [22:28] yes, but practice and theorie are different areas [22:28] my gentoo box: [22:28] raoul@sandbox raoul $ gcc --version [22:28] 2.95.3 [22:28] ill build a kernel over there [22:28] hopefully today [22:28] what kernel do you want to jump to? [22:28] ? [22:28] s/jump/bump [22:29] 2.4.24 or still at the .23 release? [22:29] right now, i'm building linux-2.4.24-vs1.23-295 [22:29] ok [22:29] (295 -> gcc version) [22:29] helping to find that lockup issue [22:29] 2953 then [22:29] yes [22:29] well, let's hope you find the lockup [22:29] mhm [22:30] i might consider upgrading my gentoo box [22:30] raoul@sandbox raoul $ uname -a [22:30] Linux sandbox.ipax.tk 2.4.18-xfs #2 Thu Aug 29 08:22:02 CEST 2002 i586 Pentium MMX GenuineIntel GNU/Linux [22:30] though nobody gots access there, so there shouldn't be that root exploit issue [22:30] *afk [22:32] <- found kernel, booting up [22:47] Zoiah (Zoiah@matryoshka.zoiah.net) left irc: Read error: Connection reset by peer [22:48] Zoiah (Zoiah@matryoshka.zoiah.net) joined #vserver. [22:59] its redhat 9 [22:59] hmm? [22:59] mine is [22:59] 13:42 nathan_: which distribution do you use? [23:02] bertl sry i had made first aid *g [23:03] np [23:03] so kernel 2.4.24 with 1.22 is ready for stressing [23:03] okay stress it with the same tool as vs1.23 (same options too) [23:03] k [23:11] mhepp (~mhepp@r72s22p13.home.nbox.cz) left irc: Quit: Tak ja padaaaaM [23:19] killer-03 running [23:21] still running [23:23] hmm, okay, how long did it take until vs1.23 hung? [23:23] aproy 1min [23:23] -y+x [23:23] okay it's now running for how long? [23:23] 4min [23:24] okay, let's give it another 20 minutes ... [23:24] np [23:24] it it doesn't crash till then, we try to revert some things from 1.23 ... [23:25] k [23:25] hmm it still running [23:40] and running [23:48] okay, guess this qualifies as stable for our tests ... [23:49] ok [23:49] now lets check again with the failing one, just to make sure, is this possible? [23:49] the remote maschine? [23:50] well, the one you hung 30 minutes ago with vs1.23 ... [23:50] (so I guess no not the remote machine) [23:50] ok [23:50] yea not the remote one [23:50] i test it [23:55] hangh [23:55] aprox 1min [23:55] ctx: 63630 [23:59] i think it's the vs1.23 [23:59] okay ... [23:59] well, the maschine in the datacenter works stell fine [23:59] let me do a small diff to 1.23 ... [00:00] --- Fri Jan 16 2004