From: Alex Lyashkov (shadow_at_itt.net.ru)
Date: Tue 24 Dec 2002 - 19:51:19 GMT
> > you have plain for create that ?
> well, I already did, but Jacques had a look on it,
> and said "that's not the way I would do it ...", but
> as far as I know it's the only way it has been done
> till now, and as far as I am concerned, it's the best
> way to do it ... anyway your mileage may vary.
i found other way to store context numbering at inodes.
I add 2 ioctl`s to inode. itself context number stored in reserved
for linux fields at ext2 inode.
> I didn't update the patches, because nobody except myself
> seem to use this patches, so if you think they are useful
> to you, I am willing to update them to 2.4.20 ctx16 ...
> remark: static context numbering is essential for the
> per server/context quota, or you will have some troubles ...
i't only one right way.