From: Jacques Gelinas (jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca)
Date: Tue 13 May 2003 - 23:20:40 BST
On Sat, 10 May 2003 02:07:05 -0500, Sam Vilain wrote
> On Fri, 02 May 2003 01:54, you wrote:
> > The time loss problem should only be a problem when those number
> > of addresses are assigned. If you allocate space for 64 but only
> > assign 4 addresses, the kernel shouldn't search all 64 slots so
> > the computational issues are only a factor in those applications
> > taking advantage of the facility to that extent. OTOH... By having
> > a static structure like this, we are allocation kernel space memory
> > which is only rarely used (the additional space) for certain specific
> > applications. Perhaps it should be "run time definable" much along
>
> Only one structure per security context. Not that bad, really.
>
> > the line of MAX_FILES or such. Set a sysctl or proc variable to
> > set the size.
>
> Probably just auto-size it when you chbind().
This is what I will do
---------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Gelinas <jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc