From: Ola Lundqvist (opal_at_debian.org)
Date: Wed 10 Dec 2003 - 22:37:12 GMT
Hi
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:10:34PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:12:30PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:07:40PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Everyone!
> > >
> > > the second linux-vserver stable release (1.20)
> > > is available at
> > >
> > > http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_release/v1.20/
> > >
> > > you can download all-in-one patches for 2.4.21/22
> > > and 2.4.23 as well as tar archives of all the
> > > splitups ...
> > >
> > > vserver-0.28 and util-vserver-0.26 will work with
> > > this release, but you'll still need the vkill tool
> > > to use the kill_ctx feature ...
> > > (newer tools will be available soon ;)
> >
> > Just a tiny question. Will earlier tools work with
> > this release too or?
> >
> > I also get this problem when patching against the Debian kernel.
> >
> > START applying patch "Virtual private servers and security contexts"
> > Testing whether "Virtual private servers and security contexts" patch for 2.4.22 applies (dry run):
> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/Makefile.rej
> > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/net/ip.h.rej
> > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/net/route.h.rej
> > 1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel/sysctl.c.rej
> > 1 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv4/udp.c.rej
> > "Virtual private servers and security contexts" patch for 2.4.22 does not apply cleanly
> > Patch /usr/src/kernel-patches/i386/apply/ctx failed.
> > Hit return to Continue
> > make: *** [stamp-debian] Interrupt
> >
> > I assume that this has to do with the Debian patched kernels.
>
> right ...
>
> > Is this something that can be solved easily? The 1.00 versions
> > did work just fine.
>
> well, I guess the debian patches of the vs1.00 worked
> fine ...
>
> is 2.4.22-3 still the current debian patch?
That is the version I have installed here anyway.
> if so, I can provide an updated version for vs1.20+fix
> just let me know ...
That would be really great.
At the same time I have to ask because on the 1.00 version I have problems
to use XFS at the same time. Do 1.20 fix that problem? I really need
XFS and CTX to work at the same time (without the need of patching the XFS patch).
If that can be solved I would be soo happy!
Thanks in advance,
// Ola
> best,
> Herbert
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > // Ola
> >
> > --
> > --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
> > / opal_at_debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
> > | opal_at_lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
> > | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
> > | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
> > \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Vserver mailing list
> > Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
-- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / opal_at_debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \ | opal_at_lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver