From: Matthew Wilcox (willy_at_debian.org)
Date: Thu 18 Dec 2003 - 16:04:50 GMT
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:01:29PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> vserver folks really do not care whether or not the
> syscall is reserved on their architecture, as long
> as it's there, and it will be there anyway, I just
> wanted to be polite and correct, so if you 'think'
> we split up the switch just for parisc(64) again,
> then I can assure you, that just won't happen ...
FYI, Christoph does not control syscall allocations on PA-RISC; I do.
I don't yet have a firm opinion on whether we should allocate this
syscall. I see both sides of this argument, but personally, I believe
sys_vserver is a mistake.
-- "Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver