About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Thu 27 May 2004 - 15:16:40 BST


On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 03:14:50PM +0200, Mike Fischer wrote:
> Enrico Scholz wrote:
> >mike.fischer_at_ipsi.fraunhofer.de (Mike Fischer) writes:
> >
> >>I've already got some vservers up and running nicely.
> >>(Kernel 2.4.22, vserver 1.00, utils 0.25)
> >Mmmh... these are very old version and lots of security leaks have been
> >fixed in the meantime.
>
> Weeeelll, guess why I'm looking into the new versions.
>
> >>I found Enrico's speech-slides which tell me that the vserver script
> >>has lots of nice switches. But neither the manpage
> >
> >The slides are mainly about the next-generation tools (see
> >http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=alpha+util-vserver). The
> >man-pages are outdated and are not an authoritive information source at
> >the moment.
> >
> >>nor the script's help has anything to say about these.
> >
> >'--help' of the vserver 0.29.214 script should tell a lot...
> >
> >>Where do I start looking or where Do I start writing documentation?
> >
> >The important reference-documentation about the configuration scheme
> >is available in an abstract XML format (see doc/configuration.xml).
> >Stylesheets for more human readable formats are welcome (afaik,
> >Olivier Poitrey is already working on a DocBook stylesheet but I do
> >not know the state).
> >
> >Else, as said, the man-pages are out-of-date and do not reflect the
> >current state. But I am not sure if I want to stay at manually written
> >man-pages, or if they should be written in DocBook.
> >
> Oh! I get the DAU-of-the-day award for assuming that utils version
> 0.29.4, as stated on Herbert's page, is the newest version.

hmm, yes probably you get it, because you should
a) check _all_ the pages and b) differenciate
between stable and development ...

(for example)
http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/d_rel26/v1.9.1/

and second, I am not updating 'suggested' tools
without good reason, and the good reason for _not_
updating them everytime a new util-vserver version
is released, is just that the announced version
was tested with the according release ...

best,
Herbert

> Sorry, for troubling you.
> How about slapping the docs from the sourcetree into the wiki?
>
> Kind regards,
> Mike Fischer
> --
> Fraunhofer Gesellschaft e.V.
> IPSI.ITI
>
> Dolivostr. 15
> 64293 Darmstadt
> Telefon: 06151 / 869 - 845
>

> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Thu 27 May 2004 - 15:17:11 BST by hypermail 2.1.3