From: Bernhard Duebi (bernhard.duebi_at_schweiz.ch)
Date: Mon 16 Aug 2004 - 06:25:27 BST
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 23:35, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:44:02PM +0200, Bernhard Duebi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 23:35, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Bernhard Duebi wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 15:15, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 03:04:48PM +0200, bernhard.duebi_at_schweiz.ch wrote:
> > As stated above I configured 2 Interfaces lo 127.X.0.1/8 and eth0
> > 10.13.2.X/23. portmap gets requests on the lo interface and I can ssh to
> > the eth0 interface. I also have postfix running, which listens on the lo
> > interface and sends mail on the eth0 interface.
> > What about the SIOCGIFADDR ioctl ?
> what about it?
> it means, 'the requested ip (insert portmap ip here)
> can not be assigned to an interface or socket'
> what are you trying to do, what is your exact config,
> which kernel do you test, what do you expect?
> using 127.X.0.1 with X!=0 seems somewhat strange,
> what is the idea behind this? 'normal' vservers do
> not use lo device, because this is a security hole
> per definition ...
Ok, let's turn it the other way round.
Does someone run a nfs-server in a 'normal' vserver (no hacks, no
unofficial patches) ?
If yes, could you please send me your setup ? Thank you very much.
Vserver mailing list