From: Bjoern Steinbrink (B.Steinbrink_at_gmx.de)
Date: Tue 17 Aug 2004 - 21:22:30 BST
On Di, 2004-08-17 at 22:11, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > So you say that setattr (that is already included) is better than
> > > vproc?
> > Ah, i forgot to mention that the version of setattr included with the
> > stable tools does not allow to change the flags for proc entries, just
> Ahh ok.
> > the flags needed for unification. That's why i said you should backport
> > setattr from the unstable branch.
> I see. Is the setattr from unstable well tested and backwards compatible?
>From my experience it works with the 2.4 as well as the 2.6 branch and
i'd say it is very well tested since 2.6 does not really work without
setattr (or vproc...) and the common way is to use the vprocunhide
script which uses setattr.
> I do not want to throw something into Debian right now (untested) because
> we are _very_ close to a release. But I do want support for 2.6 kernel. :)
> (I have not tested 2.6 kernel yet myself).
(Don't tell Bertl that you didn't test your package ;)
Vserver mailing list