Dariush Pietrzak,,, wrote:
>>Well, thats a matter of opinion... For the "average user" I would think
>>the view would be different... :)
> I have never seen this mythical "average user" you keep on talking about.
> I always thought that I'm him, but you seem to be implying that he's got
> different views then me.
I bet I'm more average than you - and to me, the flower page, is not
particarly nice... :) Well, that's just my opinion thought.
To my best memory I cannot remember any product I have used some
much time on to get up and running correctly the latest years.
Better documentation and an active forum surely would have
helped _me_ a lot anyway.
>>Problem with the wiki is that there is no forum there. If one could
>>incorporate some kind
> AFAIK most wikis has 'discusion' panels for every page
Then it's sad it isn't installed on linux-vserver's wiki...(?)
>>>And btw, not _anyone_ has the required knowledge about vserver to write
>>good documentation on the wiki anyway. Nothing is worse than wrong and outdated
> well, fragmented and non-accessible documentation is worse.
linux-vserver has it all! :-)
Just a final word from me; I would like to say that I am
_very_ impressed with Herbert's and Enrico's and all those I
cannot name and their work and support efforts on the mailing
list, wiki and IRC, and linux-vserver generally.
But if Linux-vserver is going to be big hit
someone with the right knowledge has to write consistent
and updated project documentation.
Tor Rune Skoglund
Vserver mailing list
Received on Thu Oct 20 10:14:11 2005