2005/10/28, Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 04:06:29PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> > On Friday 28 October 2005 15:45, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 10:56:58PM +0200, Grzegorz Nosek wrote:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I have noticed a disturbing pattern on my smp systems with vserver
> > > > patches (2.6.13.4 with vserver patches from gentoo).
> > >
> > > as you said, you are using the gentoo (devel)
> >
> > please specify the gentoo portage version of vserver-sources, 2.6.13.4
> > does not necessarily mean it's devel
>
> ah, sorry, got the impression that gentoo was using
> the devel branch only ... is there a list of versions
> out there and to what mainstream versions they are
> related?
>
> > additionally, vserver-sources does not have 2.6.13.4 in any version
> > number... the default gentoo kernels do not show the fourth version
> > element, and we stopped it for vserver-sources too (although
> > 2.0.1_pre2 has 2.6.13.1 as version number, it's a (cosmetic) bug...)
>
> as far as I remember, the newer versions should include
> the vserver patch version plus some gentoo marker, no?
> (at least we agreed upon that :)
>
> TIA,
> Herbert
>
I'm not using Gentoo, so I cannot relate my kernel to any Gentoo
release version. I downloaded a vanilla kernel and applied the patch
found in the Gentoo package (there were two or three trivial
conflicts)
Best regards,
Grzegorz Nosek
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Sat Oct 29 03:16:40 2005