On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:29:38PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:33:12AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
> >>On toh for my private build from upstream src (on going to build latest
> >>0.30.210), I disabled use of dietlibc (not yet available for hppa at this
> >>time) and all seems to works fine.
> >
> >
> > really depends on the dietlibc, but I'd assume it
> > is _still_ broken on HPPA, nevertheless the glibc
> > is _not_ a good alternative, although it _might_
> > work for simple things.
>
> I guess we can find out when Joel sends results of tests?
possible, well, testme and testfs will not
detect the insecurities introduced by glibc
> > PS: I hope that dietlibc on hppa will be fixed soon.
>
> Have the issues on HPPA been brought to the dietlibc developers?
yes, but AFAICT, they were ignored ...
best,
Herbert
> micah
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFD4l2h9n4qXRzy1ioRAsKMAKCv8YQr/D/9YQDQc/XOAQO/pJwe2wCggmD+
> sRKaersGBPipGCipwjTdHP0=
> =YeQB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Thu Feb 2 20:10:30 2006