________________________________________
De : ALIA Mourad NRS
Date d'envoi : jeudi 9 décembre 2010 19:14
À : vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Objet : VServer vs OpenVZ.
I made a mistake in my text :
" VServer is more tooled, simpler, virtualise the network, supports hot VM migration".
to be replaced by :
" OpenVZ is more tooled, simpler, virtualise the network, supports hot VM migration".
Sorry for that,
Cheers,
-- Mourad
Dear VServers,
As introduced in my previsous post, wa are about using VServer to emaulate P2P like VoIP peers. This is used for sacalability and performance testing of our VoIP application.
Here are our needs :
A) We want to have a maximum of VMs per server. Our server are 24 hyperthreded machine with 6 physical network interfaces :
IP Network Server NSN2U (Ballenger-NH)
Single 600W AC PSU
Memory 24 GB
CPU Dual Xeon E5645
SATA HDD 500GB
Ethernet I/O Module (four Gigabit rear ports)
B) Each VM hosts a JVM which run one or many instances of our applications.
C) The applications (VoIP peers) communicate basically through multicast.
D) Each n VMs (m applications) will use one given Eth physical interface to distribute correctly the network traffic.
Currently, there is a hot discussion in my departement on OpenVZ vs VServer : " VServer is more tooled, simpler, virtualise the network, supports hot VM migration".
What do you think about this versus ?
Any particular advise towards my use case ?
Thank you for your response and support,
Kind regards,
-- Mourad ALIA
Software Architect
OBS
*********************************
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees.
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.
Messages are susceptible to alteration.
France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender.
********************************
Received on Thu Dec 9 18:19:46 2010