Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
>> Was there a problem with the kernel
>> .6.32-44.2.el5.vs2.3.0.36.29.4.1.i686 from Daniel's CentOS repo?
>
> .1 didn't generate the initrd correctly, but that was fixed in .2.
That was what I figured. I didn't mention all the checking /testing I
did do.
<snip />
> But since these are released and in better shape generally, I don't
> see why you wouldn't go for them.
Didn't want to take another day and make another trip if the problem was
me. The system I tried on had some custom modules compiled so I wanted
check that the problem wasn't one of them. (Those custom modules are
going away so they won't be an issue any more.)
Oh yeah I will be going for the newest/latest next time I'm over there.
I'd do it remotely but they run some critical services so I like to be
there during the reboot in case I need to fall back to the older kernel.
Thanks,
Rod
-- > >> But before I plan another trip to the colo (35 miles) to update all the >> machines there I hoping for some reassurance that that it was just a bad >> day for me and kernels. :-) >Received on Wed Mar 23 14:35:02 2011