On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:17:52PM +0100, Tor Rune Skoglund wrote:
> Sounds great to me. :)
> What are the next steps?
I was waiting a little to see how the lxcfs would
work out for Linux-VServer and I also think that
some kind of FUSE based filesystem could help with
many of the Linux-VServer related filtering and
virtualization so that definitely is something we
might want to investigate a little further.
> I presume Herbert need to agree - do you? :)
I'm fine with 5.15(+) as well, it might be rather
simple to backport the changes to 5.10 lateron, so
maybe both is actually an option ...
I'm currently waiting for the pre x-mas rush in
work and thing which needs to be done to subside
and I'm also getting up-to-date with recent kernel
changes which is definitely a prerequisite for this.
Hope this clarifies,
> - Tor Rune Skoglund
> Den 09.11.2021 02:06, skrev Adrian Butterworth:
>> Hi all
>> EO is fine with 5.15.
>> With a bit of luck it may get a few more years added, else we can raise
>> (Herbert willing) for the next one that does.
>> On Thu, November 4, 2021 22:29, Ghislain Adnet wrote:
>>> Le 03/11/2021 à 16:11, Ghislain Adnet a écrit :
>>>> Economic Outlook 500 => 5.10
>>>> aqueos 2500 => 5.15
>>>> roberto 200 => no preferences
>>>> Tor Rune Skoglund 1000 => 5.15
>>>> Sandino Araico Sánchez 500 => 5.15
>>>> Thorsten Edler 250 => 5.15
>>>> roman 50 => ?
>>> seems i was hasty.
>>> Thanks for Tor Rune Skoglund for corecting me here, the consensus is
>>> 5.15 LTS and i welcome it ! :)
>>> Adrian and Roman, do you have any issue if we go this route ?
>>> Ghislain ADNET.
Received on Thu Nov 25 17:37:24 2021