From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Mon 08 Dec 2003 - 22:13:26 GMT
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:22:46PM +0100, Jan Zuchhold wrote:
> 2.4.22ctx-17c: works, no problem
> 2.4.22-vs1.00: does not work, fcntl broken
> 2.4.23-vs1.20: does not work, fcntl broken
okay, we have to do some testing, as I announced
before ...
http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/patch-net01-2.4.22-ctx17c-vs1.00.diff
this patch should be applied to 2.4.22ctx-17c with
# patch -p1 <../patch-net01-2.4.22-ctx17c-vs1.00.diff
and to 2.4.22-vs1.00 with
# patch -R -p1 <../patch-net01-2.4.22-ctx17c-vs1.00.diff
resulting in two kernels, one called
linux-2.4.22ctx-17c-net01
and the other
linux-2.4.22-vs1.00-net01r
there should be _no_ warning or error in the process
of patching both kernels, otherwise we have different
kernels (which would be interesting)
now I would like you to check both kernels with the
same .config file and do the following (to compile)
# make mrproper
# cp ../TEST.config .config
# make oldconfig
# make dep >../Dep.log
# make bzImage modules >../Build.log
install and test ...
TIA,
Herbert
PS: didn't find a difference, and unfortunately
could not reproduce yet ...
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver