From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Tue 20 Apr 2004 - 15:53:17 BST
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:38:48PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi Bjoern,
> > No, the most recent 2.6 patch is pre10. Patches, deltas and various
> > other stuff can be found here:
> > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/
> Ahh, thanks, those are better :-) Does anyone know why these aren't linked
> to by the patches page at
because I'm lazy, like every developer ;)
> > I guess you're using the stable tools, or at least a legacy
> > configuration, replace -H with -HS in the ULIMIT line. This is a general
> > kernel change introduced somewhere around 2.4.24 IIRC.
> Wow, nice of them to break binary compatibility in a stable kernel release
> :-) Still, I suppose it's not the first time.
actually it was called a bug-fix ... 8-)
> > Proc-entries are by default hidden in devel/exper. patches, more
> > information can be found here:
> > http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=Proc-Security
> > http://archives.linux-vserver.org/200401/0125.html
> > http://list.linux-vserver.org/archive/vserver/msg06552.html
> This "feature" is still giving me problems, like an inability to shut down
> vservers once they're started. I've had to turn it off for now.
> > Hmm... Don't know, maybe you're not using a static context? Basic
> > kernel/tools check script is located here:
> Seems to have been related to the old patch, the newer versions
> (1.9.0-pre9 and later) don't seem to have this problem
> Thanks very much for your help!
> Cheers, Chris.
> _ __ __ _
> / __/ / ,__(_)_ | Chris Wilson -- UNIX Firewall Lead Developer |
> / (_ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | NetServers.co.uk http://www.netservers.co.uk |
> \__/_/_/_//_/___/ | 21 Signet Court, Cambridge, UK. 01223 576516 |
> Vserver mailing list
Vserver mailing list