Well, my main reasoning was that there is no VServer Forum yet... There
is a mailing list, but with mailing lists it's much more difficult to
reply nicely to postings when you don't have the original message
anymore. The forum does not have this problem. Here all messages &
postings can be replied to indefinitely.
But I agree with you, and we leave it up to the community whether a
VServer forum will be endorsed.
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:09:11PM +0200, Evert Meulie wrote:
>>For anyone who is interested I have created a VServer forum on my site:
>I changed the entry to 'Unofficial' and asked to
>contact me at IRC, don't know when I will be there
>actually but ML is even better ...
>the main question is, do we need 'another forum'?
>basically I've tried to make the ML the one and
>only 'other' forum (besides the IRC channel), and
>I'm not convinced that we really need one besides
>that ... but I leave that to the community ...
>sidenote: when I tried your forum, it was dog-slow
>(which is something we could very likely improve
>if there is a demand for such a kind of forum)
>please let me know the reasoning behind the forum
>(e.g. rationale, advantages over ML, etc ...)
>don't get me wrong, I'm not vetoing this right now
>I'm just trying to figure the details ...
>>Vserver mailing list
Vserver mailing list
Received on Thu Oct 20 08:31:21 2005